Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp3504783wrg; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:47:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELs192223FBGVAOJ4kcJc+Xu0Fi51ggotiUOgMDvfc9kySmGSuaewUPfm2k1ehD/fBOyY5iQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4203:: with SMTP id g3-v6mr4389002pld.143.1519634871082; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:47:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519634871; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w4bbw5s0XpX9quLRppu9r8Ov9Uv7Svi/tqt4PyTEF2XzQEJTp+NE2ACsY48PhQw7TL eUg/QWWuGuJKtoCcHM67kqaHen4YVdwQLWWDwY2q0IFDRAdvDtDifz9ImikfF+yPRT1D GiboKDNMObeaJrUhQ9GScFyRvXZ+OYNGWDxI8fq4gG1oGhOauNiNKR4EnN9HvoEPRJ+Y Ag86TSPJNnArzwiq9y05woqfdwynFa6uoo4CKwktg2LZeDwmxH/mOJE69rmoZXmhqu2r /ZPPbgLq+wfTeZEI4oNmVAYHGxpQblUQCs1v1C0esc1FnDOeGmaHtpwplOPHVM4Q+HBm mrbQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=G1wQEnGbFe+r0gZR+eh0xWmuLYegpLvyZtx4kXLQUAk=; b=Sx1idMSjFdI7I5GYqJ0fWX6f33u/WKq24EhSYfxpXWZVV4kib/TK+Vq+GYV+QSE2fy SFgeTstQjGd0tFpAMchgYOWjaD8T0pSZDmhxV/IbzYch5iDnNzzCEjORnuw3FwzI9/n9 xnJcGp9I6QVOQMb0y7juuVZ5m0N349pBpQyXNAMzqukhWen/lk/2hKOehpbxT33ll6VG 2ck22LepCkwOyH1Ih0E9JVV7SBheckP30BLn+KiPJWLNf36EmVE9RyuANyJc/Uz3kxxr Wjim9oqq5dEbASYjyao1mlitw1QSpaMzpt631U2OK3xHUMeYxVWQsSwHkd81quVSKgIX KhFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s71si5295258pgc.17.2018.02.26.00.47.36; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751916AbeBZIqi (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 03:46:38 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:35801 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751022AbeBZIqh (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 03:46:37 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w1Q8k4Xj017659; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 02:46:04 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id w1Q8k3EY017657; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 02:46:03 -0600 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 02:46:02 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Christophe LEROY Cc: Mathieu Malaterre , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/21] powerpc: Avoid comparison of unsigned long >= 0 in pfn_valid Message-ID: <20180226084602.GR21977@gate.crashing.org> References: <20180225172236.29650-1-malat@debian.org> <20180225172236.29650-6-malat@debian.org> <55d52f37-c24d-c2da-43c6-73a55403d3b6@c-s.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <55d52f37-c24d-c2da-43c6-73a55403d3b6@c-s.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:32:03AM +0100, Christophe LEROY wrote: > Le 25/02/2018 ? 18:22, Mathieu Malaterre a ?crit?: > >-#define pfn_valid(pfn) ((pfn) >= ARCH_PFN_OFFSET && (pfn) < > >max_mapnr) > >+#define pfn_valid(pfn) \ > >+ (((pfn) - ARCH_PFN_OFFSET) < (max_mapnr - ARCH_PFN_OFFSET)) > > What will happen when ARCH_PFN_OFFSET is not nul and pfn is lower than > ARCH_PFN_OFFSET ? It will work fine. Say you are asking for a <= x < b so (in actual integers, no overflow) that is 0 <= x-a < b-a and you also assume x-a overflows, so that we are actually comparing x-a+M < b-a with M = 2**32 or such (the maximum value in the unsigned integer type plus one). This comparison is obviously always false. (It also works if b < a btw). Segher