Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271816AbTHDPmP (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:42:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271818AbTHDPmO (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:42:14 -0400 Received: from mx01.netapp.com ([198.95.226.53]:11724 "EHLO mx01.netapp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271816AbTHDPmO (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:42:14 -0400 From: Brian Pawlowski Message-Id: <200308041542.h74Fg9k26251@orbit-fe.eng.netapp.com> Subject: Re: FS: hardlinks on directories In-Reply-To: <20030804134415.GA4454@win.tue.nl> from Andries Brouwer at "Aug 4, 3 03:44:15 pm" To: aebr@win.tue.nl (Andries Brouwer) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Cc: skraw@ithnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME++ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 629 Lines: 15 I'm still waking up, but '..' obviously breaks the "no cycle" observations. It's just that '..' is well known name by utilities as opposed to arbitrary links. Symlinks as poor man's link can create unwanted cycles (but are caught again by utils?) I was always wondering what to do with all those spare CPU cycles, running around in circles in the file system will soak them up. :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/