Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp4336660wrg; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:55:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227g5C06qS2ON+0JSJkosB+A/2PsKg5si3uE+/xoPxt4gYFpp9oTtvu/MB6Vka4OPgNKiF7c X-Received: by 10.99.181.94 with SMTP id u30mr9826648pgo.205.1519689307605; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:55:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519689307; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HARNIFWyAZh1HoJ8ciLNGBERJp0IsEReDDMA8xnmTnH17Zdl7OaczSt+K7O27i5rgT wE9KonewMalNtFYm0Jt8+LK0LE9ZAkZamJG6PjbbSGxzb+3BcdJbarH9UP/DaCABwn2K UpMyVzJwFpFzrvUzcKkShNLYFdQ4MttRpTnzexk2dW/Xpjh0FGzes7g4FStYKV5cPH0e A+zEK8++f+Ql8AdgTvJPZlgEhayIy84DjWZl0d3DuZw1YYfg0H3u2vm6S8uoC7AUohY/ j/ANJHffY8/IXPZMvlcgv8inWkduEIwh3DfRAfp8sK201NwRNirUEeJ9rsuSPuyutowJ kh/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=Ooox3zXQQtvgPTLXRZHB4KA32tzTto9NKKKo+rstla0=; b=Q/PrrOvZO/exB/v2huojuic9oUeKuqK3F/MTH4mYtKfkJDfMnjEOIOpwnBBQKfwgsh iQ1D1lKVQ7XTWsYQijobABzFuiAaDFU0y4ywFveBCTsvg4A4v3SkjWUTGagyP83RbABz BwVRt4bK/HiobqQIS00NAkwL/8hoy7yw6hlzVMxaRk2ceg2dgpzotXekg0Cp6y/EYKFo V4z2ScEknDX4iIgi67jlsFcMUBRqtfd0u1gdTmhp3pCaSp/xbJEIduh1io6xVmMLUiX/ FESvuo9brpx687U/5SYtDcKAb4YUuWKPK60PJq5aEeeth3sesn2bdm2EeCg44+X82zYS hhFw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x5-v6si7560322plm.11.2018.02.26.15.54.50; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751554AbeBZXyG (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:54:06 -0500 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:37242 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175AbeBZXyF (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:54:05 -0500 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1eqSaq-0001zr-Ig; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:54:04 -0700 Received: from 174-19-85-160.omah.qwest.net ([174.19.85.160] helo=x220.int.ebiederm.org) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1eqSap-0005iL-Lz; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:54:04 -0700 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alban Crequy , Seth Forshee , Sargun Dhillon , Dongsu Park , "Serge E. Hallyn" , "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:52:56 -0600 Message-Id: <20180226235302.12708-1-ebiederm@xmission.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: <87po4rz4ui.fsf_-_@xmission.com> References: <87po4rz4ui.fsf_-_@xmission.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1eqSap-0005iL-Lz;;;mid=<20180226235302.12708-1-ebiederm@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=174.19.85.160;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/PDj16ZF0z1t1IBbnWpBlIM4vXMVUg6SQ= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 174.19.85.160 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on sa01.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,TVD_RCVD_IP,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, XMGappySubj_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=78] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=78 X-Spam-Combo: *;Miklos Szeredi X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 545 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.2 (0.6%), b_tie_ro: 2.1 (0.4%), parse: 1.19 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 26 (4.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 2.8 (0.5%), tests_pri_-1000: 10 (1.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.99 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.61 (0.3%), tests_pri_-400: 30 (5.6%), check_bayes: 28 (5.2%), b_tokenize: 11 (2.1%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.3%), b_comp_prob: 4.0 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.7 (0.5%), b_finish: 0.81 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 458 (84.1%), check_dkim_signature: 0.83 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 4.2 (0.8%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v7 1/7] fuse: Remove the buggy retranslation of pids in fuse_dev_do_read X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At the point of fuse_dev_do_read the user space process that initiated the action on the fuse filesystem may no longer exist. The process have been killed or may have fired an asynchronous request and exited. If the initial process has exited the code "pid_vnr(find_pid_ns(in->h.pid, fc->pid_ns)" will either return a pid of 0, or in the unlikely event that the pid has been reallocated it can return practically any pid. Any pid is possible as the pid allocator allocates pid numbers in different pid namespaces independently. The only way to make translation in fuse_dev_do_read reliable is to call get_pid in fuse_req_init_context, and pid_vnr followed by put_pid in fuse_dev_do_read. That reference counting in other contexts has been shown to bounce cache lines between processors and in general be slow. So that is not desirable. The only known user of running the fuse server in a different pid namespace from the filesystem does not care what the pids are in the fuse messages so removing this code should not matter. Getting the translation to a server running outside of the pid namespace of a container can still be achieved by playing setns games at mount time. It is also possible to add an option to pass a pid namespace into the fuse filesystem at mount time. Fixes: 5d6d3a301c4e ("fuse: allow server to run in different pid_ns") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/fuse/dev.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c index 5d06384c2cae..0fb58f364fa6 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c @@ -1260,12 +1260,6 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_do_read(struct fuse_dev *fud, struct file *file, in = &req->in; reqsize = in->h.len; - if (task_active_pid_ns(current) != fc->pid_ns) { - rcu_read_lock(); - in->h.pid = pid_vnr(find_pid_ns(in->h.pid, fc->pid_ns)); - rcu_read_unlock(); - } - /* If request is too large, reply with an error and restart the read */ if (nbytes < reqsize) { req->out.h.error = -EIO; -- 2.14.1