Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272433AbTHEFEO (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 01:04:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272435AbTHEFEO (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 01:04:14 -0400 Received: from c210-49-248-224.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:2460 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272433AbTHEFEM (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 01:04:12 -0400 Message-ID: <1060059844.3f2f3ac46e2f2@kolivas.org> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 15:04:04 +1000 From: Con Kolivas To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux kernel mailing list , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Felipe Alfaro Solana Subject: Re: [PATCH] O13int for interactivity References: <200308050207.18096.kernel@kolivas.org> <200308051220.04779.kernel@kolivas.org> <3F2F149F.1020201@cyberone.com.au> <200308051318.47464.kernel@kolivas.org> <3F2F2517.7080507@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3F2F2517.7080507@cyberone.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1422 Lines: 39 Quoting Nick Piggin : > > > Con Kolivas wrote: > > >On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:21, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > >>No, this still special-cases the uninterruptible sleep. Why is this > >>needed? What is being worked around? There is probably a way to > >>attack the cause of the problem. > >> > > > >Footnote: I was thinking of using this to also _elevate_ the dynamic > priority > >of tasks waking from interruptible sleep as well which may help throughput. > > > > Con, an uninterruptible sleep is one which is not be woken by a signal, > an interruptible sleep is one which is. There is no other connotation. > What happens when read/write syscalls are changed to be interruptible? > I'm not saying this will happen... but come to think of it, NFS probably > has interruptible read/write. > > In short: make the same policy for an interruptible and an uninterruptible > sleep. That's the policy that has always existed... Interesting that I have only seen the desired effect and haven't noticed any side effect from this change so far. I'll keep experimenting as much as possible (as if I wasn't going to) and see what the testers find as well. Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/