Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272435AbTHEFKP (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 01:10:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272437AbTHEFKO (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 01:10:14 -0400 Received: from www.erfrakon.de ([193.197.159.57]:62217 "EHLO www.erfrakon.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272435AbTHEFKK (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 01:10:10 -0400 From: Martin Konold Organization: erfrakon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 07:04:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/kroupware-1.0.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308050704.22684.martin.konold@erfrakon.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 908 Lines: 30 Hi, when using 2.6.0.test1 on a high end laptop (P-IV 2.2 GHz, 1GB RAM) I notice very significant slowdown in interactive usage compared to 2.4.21. The difference is most easily seen when switching folders in kmail. While 2.4.21 is instantaneous 2.6.0.test1 shows the clock for about 2-3 seconds. I am using maildir folders on reiserfs. Can anyone verify this behaviour? What other information do you need? Regards, -- martin Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold e r f r a k o n Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959 email: martin.konold@erfrakon.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/