Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272484AbTHEHX4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 03:23:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272535AbTHEHX4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 03:23:56 -0400 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:37636 "EHLO small.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272484AbTHEHXz (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 03:23:55 -0400 Subject: Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21 From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Martin Konold Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <200308050704.22684.martin.konold@erfrakon.de> References: <200308050704.22684.martin.konold@erfrakon.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1060068224.604.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:23:44 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 803 Lines: 19 On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 07:04, Martin Konold wrote: > Hi, > > when using 2.6.0.test1 on a high end laptop (P-IV 2.2 GHz, 1GB RAM) I notice > very significant slowdown in interactive usage compared to 2.4.21. Please, upgrade to the latest 2.6.0-test kernel, as there are a lot of people working on the CPU scheduler and interactivity. As of this mail, it's 2.6.0-test2-bk4. If you prefer, you can also test 2.6.0-test2-mm4 (Andrew Morton patches on top of 2.6.0-test2). This way, you can help us in improving the interactive feeling of future 2.6 kernels. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/