Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:23:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:22:50 -0500 Received: from mail.zmailer.org ([194.252.70.162]:40978 "EHLO zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:22:39 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:21:46 +0200 From: Matti Aarnio To: Alan Cox Cc: Anton Blanchard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: allow notsc option for buggy cpus Message-ID: <20010310222146.L23336@mea-ext.zmailer.org> In-Reply-To: <20010310115828.A7514@linuxcare.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 01:19:03AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 01:19:03AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > My IBM Thinkpad 600E changes between 100MHz and 400MHz depending if the > > power is on. This means gettimeofday goes backwards if you boot with the > Intel speedstep CPU. > > > Even so, we should really catch these cpus at run time. > Intel are being remarkably reluctant on the documentation front. We have > the AMD speed change docs, but the intel ones (chipset not cpu based > primarily) don't seem to be publically available. In fact the 815M manual > looks like someone quite pointedly went through and removed the relevant > material before publication Isn't that one of the things that the ACPI is for ? Aren't we supposed to use ACPI for this ? /Matti Aarnio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/