Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp6708230wrg; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:08:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226OtQpcH9oBU6rz2GeDiD2abgIPDv+39RYmWR1lj+hgZvl7lMuXysUao+Tkiefwdstx49X+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8c93:: with SMTP id t19-v6mr18607474plo.304.1519855717373; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:08:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519855717; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sI8F4sNQl4TrJObxgSSwavTNPKql6kYW6Mgqy2kd5UHgA/sJyDZ936bLKKmY56Y2ze dRU63hoP8UbbHX7Wtn+YiYw9Sd+/JJgRqlriJpquzp3dSw7xkxt5zay+zicVarzmkIiQ fllofFnHs9An3T4dUTCiwe0JXtIUc1x1af6bwYBHZBslEb6sU13zDCGN1o2qiH85KmE+ QN086uSYq+9QMbc+eZUKh8MpXAc2qssyHoL4onECw2kFr8vj70jMiHzfjCSUvauO0fxC hnHSpuOd9u6RzkYYjTLj6NPeWXJ4oWq4yw9utOL4R4c+8ALgrM4A1cp5Z4C5zdZwbhA/ VSNA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=m0LYSuwtP8U45Z7etrtHPtxdE00Z7mP4oopiGZ57PWA=; b=dAaR9oOO1F9rnWfh3+HvfTxTaf/kmAqfcyQad6PUcHgK760v2q9VJwsVho6ZrfLqR8 pu2ZizpV/5Xt8xSmwR5jfe2UcTXm0hi5i/HIrPE9Nq6U8oyYtkMKSYanbx6YHlqBxTjX UVwZ0hAW4Cxcgspw79gCQr8W86pn5gF2rYX8k8Ww7Jzz5EpV0MNSLR63NYV9KEemcuES MEzIU/E6k27MX9D2bphL5yhM2RMPmuUKpmXbkYH+42Ce43glpv3SSwHFa+55OiLosfhC 3Qy/OLRHzgrpLQyVGeoCSTf4HVTZ+uk9MUoMgb66R6N4jBCRQUGGaXqqOJNNapzWtfCh kxLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g12-v6si1851403pla.564.2018.02.28.14.08.22; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:08:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935403AbeB1WHf (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:07:35 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:58196 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935365AbeB1WHd (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:07:33 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C2216BA; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:07:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from beelzebub.austin.arm.com (beelzebub.austin.arm.com [10.118.12.119]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A961D3F246; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:07:32 -0800 (PST) From: Jeremy Linton To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com, vkilari@codeaurora.org, ahs3@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, palmer@sifive.com, lenb@kernel.org, john.garry@huawei.com, austinwc@codeaurora.org, tnowicki@caviumnetworks.com, Jeremy Linton Subject: [PATCH v7 13/13] arm64: topology: divorce MC scheduling domain from core_siblings Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:06:19 -0600 Message-Id: <20180228220619.6992-14-jeremy.linton@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.6 In-Reply-To: <20180228220619.6992-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> References: <20180228220619.6992-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Now that we have an accurate view of the physical topology we need to represent it correctly to the scheduler. In the case of NUMA in socket, we need to assure that the sched domain we build for the MC layer isn't larger than the DIE above it. To do this correctly, we should really base that on the cache topology immediately below the NUMA node (for NUMA in socket) or below the physical package for normal NUMA configurations. This patch creates a set of early cache_siblings masks, then when the scheduler requests the coregroup mask we pick the smaller of the physical package siblings, or the numa siblings and locate the largest cache which is an entire subset of those siblings. If we are unable to find a proper subset of cores then we retain the original behavior and return the core_sibling list. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton --- arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 5 +++ arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h index 6b10459e6905..08db3e4e44e1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h @@ -4,12 +4,17 @@ #include +#define MAX_CACHE_CHECKS 4 + struct cpu_topology { int thread_id; int core_id; int package_id; + int cache_id[MAX_CACHE_CHECKS]; cpumask_t thread_sibling; cpumask_t core_sibling; + cpumask_t cache_siblings[MAX_CACHE_CHECKS]; + int cache_level; }; extern struct cpu_topology cpu_topology[NR_CPUS]; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c index bd1aae438a31..1809dc9d347c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c @@ -212,8 +212,42 @@ static int __init parse_dt_topology(void) struct cpu_topology cpu_topology[NR_CPUS]; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_topology); +static void find_llc_topology_for_cpu(int cpu) +{ + /* first determine if we are a NUMA in package */ + const cpumask_t *node_mask = cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu)); + int indx; + + if (!cpumask_subset(node_mask, &cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling)) { + /* not numa in package, lets use the package siblings */ + node_mask = &cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling; + } + + /* + * node_mask should represent the smallest package/numa grouping + * lets search for the largest cache smaller than the node_mask. + */ + for (indx = 0; indx < MAX_CACHE_CHECKS; indx++) { + cpumask_t *cache_sibs = &cpu_topology[cpu].cache_siblings[indx]; + + if (cpu_topology[cpu].cache_id[indx] < 0) + continue; + + if (cpumask_subset(cache_sibs, node_mask)) + cpu_topology[cpu].cache_level = indx; + } +} + const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu) { + int *llc = &cpu_topology[cpu].cache_level; + + if (*llc == -1) + find_llc_topology_for_cpu(cpu); + + if (*llc != -1) + return &cpu_topology[cpu].cache_siblings[*llc]; + return &cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling; } @@ -221,6 +255,7 @@ static void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid) { struct cpu_topology *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid]; int cpu; + int idx; /* update core and thread sibling masks */ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { @@ -229,6 +264,16 @@ static void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid) if (cpuid_topo->package_id != cpu_topo->package_id) continue; + for (idx = 0; idx < MAX_CACHE_CHECKS; idx++) { + cpumask_t *lsib; + int cput_id = cpuid_topo->cache_id[idx]; + + if (cput_id == cpu_topo->cache_id[idx]) { + lsib = &cpuid_topo->cache_siblings[idx]; + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, lsib); + } + } + cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling); if (cpu != cpuid) cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->core_sibling); @@ -286,10 +331,18 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void) for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { struct cpu_topology *cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu]; + int idx; cpu_topo->thread_id = -1; cpu_topo->core_id = 0; cpu_topo->package_id = -1; + cpu_topo->cache_level = -1; + + for (idx = 0; idx < MAX_CACHE_CHECKS; idx++) { + cpu_topo->cache_id[idx] = -1; + cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->cache_siblings[idx]); + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->cache_siblings[idx]); + } cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->core_sibling); cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->core_sibling); @@ -311,6 +364,9 @@ static int __init parse_acpi_topology(void) is_threaded = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK; for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + int tidx = 0; + int i; + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 0); if (topology_id < 0) return topology_id; @@ -325,6 +381,14 @@ static int __init parse_acpi_topology(void) } topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu); cpu_topology[cpu].package_id = topology_id; + + for (i = 0; i < MAX_CACHE_CHECKS; i++) { + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(cpu, i + 1); + if (topology_id > 0) { + cpu_topology[cpu].cache_id[tidx] = topology_id; + tidx++; + } + } } return 0; -- 2.13.6