Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 09:23:43 +0200
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] xhci: Add Intel extended cap / otg phy mux
 handling
Message-ID: <20180301072343.GB5335@kuha.fi.intel.com>
References: <20180228150749.26831-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
 <20180228150749.26831-9-hdegoede@redhat.com>
 <20180228151552.GA5335@kuha.fi.intel.com>
 <070f5ccd-dfeb-1e47-681a-8e116472ef9f@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <070f5ccd-dfeb-1e47-681a-8e116472ef9f@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 28-02-18 16:15, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> > > index 96099a245c69..5917e3095e2a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> > > @@ -1825,6 +1825,7 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
> > >   /* Reserved. It was XHCI_U2_DISABLE_WAKE */
> > >   #define XHCI_ASMEDIA_MODIFY_FLOWCONTROL	(1 << 28)
> > >   #define XHCI_HW_LPM_DISABLE	(1 << 29)
> > > +#define XHCI_INTEL_USB_ROLE_SW	(1 << 30)
> > 
> > Did you rebased these on tope of the latest usb-next?
> 
> No I did not expect that to be necessary, but I see now that it is.
> I've just done a rebase locally, any other remarks before I send
> out a v6?

Nothing from me.


Thanks,

-- 
heikki