Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272536AbTHEQYb (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:24:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272551AbTHEQYb (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:24:31 -0400 Received: from poup.poupinou.org ([195.101.94.96]:6406 "EHLO poup.poupinou.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272536AbTHEQYa (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:24:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:24:28 +0200 To: Tomas Szepe Cc: lkml Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two Message-ID: <20030805162428.GB1511@poupinou.org> References: <20030805072631.GC5876@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030805161117.GA1511@poupinou.org> <20030805161505.GD18982@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030805161505.GD18982@louise.pinerecords.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Ducrot Bruno Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 587 Lines: 17 On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:15:05PM +0200, Tomas Szepe wrote: > o only enable cpufreq options if power management is selected > o don't put cpufreq options in a separate submenu Yes, but what I do not understand is why cpufreq need power management. -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/