Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267471AbTHERrF (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:47:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267491AbTHERrE (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:47:04 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:58531 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267471AbTHERrC (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:47:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 19:46:57 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: Patrick Mochel Cc: Ducrot Bruno , lkml Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two Message-ID: <20030805174657.GA22909@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030805165117.GH18982@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 924 Lines: 27 > [mochel@osdl.org] > > I can buy that. There are actually three levels of power management that > we handle: > > - System Power Management (swsusp, CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) > - Device Power Management (kernel/pm.c, future driver model support) > - CPU Power Management (cpufreq) > > SPM implies that DPM will be enabled, but both DPM and CPM can exist > without SPM, and independently of each other. All of them would > essentially fall under CONFIG_PM.. Ok, that makes a lot of sense. > Would you willing to whip up a patch for the Kconfig entries? Sure, I'll try to put something together so we have a patch to start playing with. -- Tomas Szepe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/