Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 2/7] xen/pvh: Move PVH entry code out
 of Xen specific tree
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@oracle.com>
Cc:     roger.pau@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, hch@infradead.org,
        JBeulich@suse.com, x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        thomas.lendacky@amd.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        rkrcmar@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mchehab@kernel.org,
        hpa@zytor.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        rdunlap@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de, davem@davemloft.net,
        kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
References: <1519842483-8887-1-git-send-email-maran.wilson@oracle.com>
 <1519842483-8887-3-git-send-email-maran.wilson@oracle.com>
 <20180228210814.GK11576@char.us.oracle.com>
 <e9133f97-7ecf-2868-6883-3f0cda7bbb2f@redhat.com>
 <20f82d4c-9591-7770-aeca-0331a7940f5d@suse.com>
 <98eda294-8491-35a2-b278-aeedc079640f@redhat.com>
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <1b8962c1-8ab5-cddc-0c0b-a7419aab424b@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:15:57 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <98eda294-8491-35a2-b278-aeedc079640f@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03/01/2018 03:46 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/03/2018 07:11, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Probably a better place for these would be
>>> arch/x86/platform/pvh/{enlighten.c,head.S}.  (Just because there are no
>>> .c or .S files in arch/x86).
>> Right.
>>
>>> Maybe Xen ought to be moved under
>>> arch/x86/platform too.
>> And hyperv and kvm, too?


I was actually thinking about having arch/x86/virt where xen, kvm,
hyperv etc should go. Not as part of this series, obviously.

-boris


> Actually yes, though for kvm I'd move the files in arch/x86/kernel
> (arch/x86/kvm is the hypervisor itself, not the "platform").
>
>> No, I think arch/x86/xen/ is fine.
> np, it was just a (somewhat crazy) suggestion. :)
>
> Paolo