Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp9050751wrg; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:24:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtEJ2jNeUBHBuRBTNBumB5FxlB2ucu3yvc7A5z8yiw5XKrlmYgu51xBRnyF3wR3D2xVYKXy X-Received: by 10.98.117.139 with SMTP id q133mr6779450pfc.64.1520022250265; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 12:24:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520022250; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FoOBnV8kDr4zLfUbgrmhz4Ono9Ay13y/KIw3kpm07y/qTd0kGt+heOFIrNHTfAtSR1 isMvs3FvEw4Xp/TWM2hu1x7Fc/HeywtEBmFBFT9h4tcwOytlyxMQRA0D8YrDj+1IFIAj 3nFhZA/KPi02sSVD8e7MeibToA2BYkKLJM5ZB0O60mTOWmk1bv8vqPJ+Ju7RJVUTJi/G I9lM3bmj5IW5ZFKyg2+YRDpbg89REeHkC6LmIuLJ5Kbt4WriFWn64XL6RWR7wLGJL+AV nElHQWESyy2hFyYD4T2iHrORJqXzu2o2OBhzDK6tf/QRHTg5N8sWLERPQEqarxWpJp4D AOTQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=LDwuXJOm2Kurg53ZZiTdBBU1t38ItaIqKfzjQ6fbJfo=; b=cfIvBBnbqTPRodSeuqVsJub/mCZzjZbqocVzy4c2HKWmM7dQHzJpwen4ilscZwYWVv /UprktdNAKQvHfpAuydejgtoR72ye6+MqrO3gzW7+df8MlRtflxmFZvHzz2YTI8DT4rU n96BUyzjn4FO4b7wl3VH/uzkT7mfB15vFpPF3hdFgu76NsaLG0RW7B3H0NP6x7Tqbj+7 4/zFYqT0Lc8V/oZa4W3Mm2gfCIws2jpLFVNsPEJ8h3nNPnu5wzOMPbZZMErzUrXRCn7G C9zoFVysMf8zWGTycgNDJyHD3vgm3emSLO0LUxRL6auLSOsDkEKv8rsg89n9Ptgdu/iW TFtA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h11si4439127pgq.28.2018.03.02.12.23.47; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 12:24:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946744AbeCBRhr (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:37:47 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:47666 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946676AbeCBRho (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:37:44 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w22HZxbP121660 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:37:44 -0500 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gfahg9u26-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 12:37:44 -0500 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:37:42 -0500 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.28) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:37:37 -0500 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w22Hbb5052232292; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 17:37:37 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64809B204D; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:39:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.216]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE94B2046; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:39:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 637A116C20C1; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 09:38:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 09:38:08 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Alan Stern Cc: Boqun Feng , LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa , Andrea Parri , David Howells , Jade Alglave , Luc Maranget , Nicholas Piggin , Peter Zijlstra , Will Deacon , Kernel development list Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2 RFC] tools/memory-model: redefine rb in terms of rcu-fence Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20180302045015.GO3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18030217-2213-0000-0000-0000027948E1 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00008610; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000254; SDB=6.00997363; UDB=6.00507127; IPR=6.00776681; MB=3.00019822; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-03-02 17:37:40 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18030217-2214-0000-0000-0000594A1C35 Message-Id: <20180302173808.GR3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-03-02_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1803020208 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 10:17:55AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:31:41PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:37:58AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:49:06AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > [ . . . ] > > > > > > And as Andrea pointed out off-list, I did indeed mess up Boqun's change. > > > > I forgot to change the "irreflexive" into "acyclic". Applying that change > > > > makes everything work. > > > > > > > > Please accept my apologies for my confusion! > > > > > > > > > > np, also I should have provided a proper patch for your testing. > > > > > > For this Alan's patch, feel free to add: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng > > > > Alan's last submission was still RFC, so I have not yet queued it. > > So this ball is still in Alan's court. > > I'll wait a few more days to see if there are any other comments and > then submit it officially. Will do! Thanx, Paul