Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp301133wrg; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 19:42:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtcJ7jvaYvi4J7yEEYE022CzCcxgJsMbdrO+kb/P4uLveEJh3K0FSg3Fyrrw67soNMEtIji X-Received: by 10.101.91.199 with SMTP id o7mr6378815pgr.9.1520048574578; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 19:42:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520048574; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SwkuLJSqL0mEH0YKzSvA48cCSAqCyJ80k1bn2USb9zd/EnLCb6pqhAixZGqQ+eUHZg sj3M/vIuVKDHV9W2/uZWvaKNN6c1vWWp80BCR4WNrTB94Ck7psIje04sHkx8OjFryO4i vh8lxT5FcTatzqe0iuEx/vsVKb4BvyxE+D9INzTm+VjCC7TuvA8WYIi1zQMZVBK+cXWN OkdApqmMLlOQrhs5QF+lFlI6hLhm1HEfBxQ+0hX071aV0wnfWb1hFOl439PI/u0imZz5 QmsHWgPHn+Q+h8Y9V+v38V2cVNemzFrJDT4x2UXlFd0HZw5JUj8cw/7x2X1r3byNNcVt 7ATg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=RUW1FYeQBFn9dks/XYaTM/gQyKc/PBhfWxQqvXQStWk=; b=k8ZGzLXl6/pohddiWxbxcEqM0qfrr/boawPpvoRFOnMQ5DTdQ73YDZqjuZuO/jiYtL HgUDzwJj41D1mpD4PqXgcE73aMQighjWg2+JPb1PRAVWl4yLIB2rF8yCBiytOa2S7zy3 /8ywUdYZV28ZjqdZtwtHzYOZ7Aa5P348q+NRYfehBrOVEe/uCwv/Pqh2kGBvrXILL67Q YDVzksQ+Ool4oyvKJyTJrG4AMpi+9A5j+mlPW8My5zAvI3g3OTg8TCwT2Jd2qAYzBPnd HotqqFFDHav1nooPYzttqvnkqxEvfAaS/OmjYx9girpunA5SVjJl5n1e8BdJy39/dguD DH4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e13-v6si4633782pln.204.2018.03.02.19.42.40; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 19:42:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933970AbeCBXHl (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 18:07:41 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:38414 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932885AbeCBXHk (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 18:07:40 -0500 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id DF1BA68D10; Sat, 3 Mar 2018 00:07:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 00:07:38 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Laurence Oberman , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] genirq/affinity: move actual irq vector spread into one helper Message-ID: <20180302230738.GB31468@lst.de> References: <20180206121742.29336-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180206121742.29336-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180206121742.29336-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:17:39PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > No functional change, just prepare for converting to 2-stage > irq vector spread. > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Christoph Hellwig > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei > --- > kernel/irq/affinity.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c > index 4b1c4763212d..6af3f6727f63 100644 > --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static void build_node_to_cpumask(cpumask_var_t *masks) > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, masks[cpu_to_node(cpu)]); > } > > -static int get_nodes_in_cpumask(cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask, > +static int get_nodes_in_cpumask(const cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask, > const struct cpumask *mask, nodemask_t *nodemsk) Maybe you can split all your constifications into a separate prep patch? > +int irq_build_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd, > + const cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask, > + const struct cpumask *cpu_mask, > + struct cpumask *nmsk, > + struct cpumask *masks) static? Otherwise looks fine: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig