Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 03:16:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 03:16:25 -0500 Received: from horus.its.uow.edu.au ([130.130.68.25]:16876 "EHLO horus.its.uow.edu.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 03:16:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3AAB3461.D0AB56F9@uow.edu.au> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:16:33 +1100 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.3-pre3 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Owens CC: mingo@elte.hu, Alan Cox , lkml Subject: Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:53:40 BST." <15973.984297609@ocs3.ocs-net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Keith Owens wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:53:40 +0100 (CET), > Ingo Molnar wrote: > >it sure has an alternative. The 'cpus spinning' code calls touch_nmi() > >within the busy loop, the polling code on the control CPU too. This is > >sure more robust and catches lockup bugs in kdb too ... > > Works for me. It even makes kdb simpler. humm... OK, this seems doable in the case of serial console. For CONFIG_LP_CONSOLE (which has the same problem) it looks like we can just call touch_nmi() in lp_console_write(). I'll see what Tim has to say. - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/