Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 5 Mar 2018 08:42:03 -0600
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc:     Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
        Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@virtuozzo.com>,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/8] livepatch: Correctly handle atomic replace for
 not yet loaded modules
Message-ID: <20180305144203.2u3i2jzznsb7swsn@treble>
References: <20180221132914.4809-1-pmladek@suse.com>
 <20180221132914.4809-8-pmladek@suse.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.21.1802222145160.21576@pobox.suse.cz>
 <20180301102859.zwrt6w36ub474nb2@pathway.suse.cz>
 <7f920ec3-dfe0-6a4d-dd25-5d5c4fa75714@redhat.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.21.1803051050330.26605@pobox.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1803051050330.26605@pobox.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:54:16AM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > I think this problem is contained to only replacement patches that need
> > the nop-revert feature... if the replacement patch provides a new
> > function definition, then it shouldn't be affected.
> > 
> > Man, we need a regression test suite for all these cases :)
> 
> Any volunteer?

I'd strongly prefer that we get such selftests in place before merging
any more major features...

-- 
Josh