Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270865AbTHFR26 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:28:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270871AbTHFR26 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:28:58 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:50436 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270869AbTHFR2R (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:28:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:28:13 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Oleg Drokin Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.6] reiserfs: fix locking in reiserfs_remount Message-ID: <20030806172813.GB21290@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Oleg Drokin , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030806093858.GF14457@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030806093858.GF14457@namesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 593 Lines: 15 On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:38:58PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > Since reiserfs_remount can be called without BKL held, we better take BKL in there. > Please apply the below patch. It is against 2.6.0-test2 is the BKL in reiserfs_write_unlock()? Do we need to be adding more BKL usage, instead of the same or less at this point? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/