Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 13/22] mm, rmap: Free encrypted pages once mapcount
 drops to zero
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
References: <20180305162610.37510-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <20180305162610.37510-14-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Message-ID: <eb2cc1cf-1be1-4535-f71b-fa33272a6f71@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:12:15 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180305162610.37510-14-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03/05/2018 08:26 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>  extern void prep_encrypt_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order);
> +extern void free_encrypt_page(struct page *page, int keyid, unsigned int order);

The grammar here is weird, I think.

Why not free_encrypted_page()?