Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp3124783wrg; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:42:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELufn74nxq1QnzQKkXmfzu6UNxUeAoJ7GW0YOEvJZ4umCb3o90AsbwK8lbYqI7kSKRtd9+uv X-Received: by 10.99.149.87 with SMTP id t23mr13344021pgn.411.1520289767601; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 14:42:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520289767; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ONkGwmIIfy8Ol2YXdVNkP+CFs38qe6jmRK4GGyrNKQum8cYmVXKH48VyqeTy7MG2un qrIAxzlhMknJB+mEQcrkE06r9MdaRG63J1ecb8YJ47dIo6ch3vpdu7OWJTI0muLdkGff icm/eAnWAeEhNlRp/IC3zaf/ebGLIZPoSbKYnON+iWSnW4HAXGY/x0SRJKhe23AgZqcT 5CMACr+U9HOFVjyXgxEV8TJGGb3Z5S9a/5uhZvYhwI/soErwSZ44XJAK7E3gpuWxexio BkxYnAAMWQ83EUuzEWX4uyj/aGkpr/Q+ASM6goI69OQCZiq5Q2lBRMtTNDkcICn/0HLF 5mSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=xq3x/xsWZ1nYATcjQ4HHT6gNNAJ00iu46te+kVURsEo=; b=b8klZE4WcVHJSnQfg5SBw7CK5GWNPflL9BykLrProkp4L+7uJZXWEXKBFctcfD4s/6 Hdr2oqyA6lsbP3p8I3Y1ecSB7ZqJGzVeXvHGiT3Im6mLhI+PRoUZfLtexWRQsxj2A29L cnhDHqIDvmxArgrV6AA2MTZxV+7ifLTMPHMKoPOZlylDHKAT0nQh4dYWuZK9JGFphSCj LZbKzOjbPNn33i1jknKdQ9ARjMh14gTFJ20D8+Ei6z6/ZrbXNABgCpmUj6x5ZgVM4k8f RGIcKNrT2IrTncJBnqQjkCvvxwUXyDYBsUJaWGZ0Ly9Ji3HG7bTyEJZxyyrrbKZD4a3o hE8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lunn.ch header.s=20171124 header.b=uIP37FQG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m10si8933726pgs.523.2018.03.05.14.42.32; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 14:42:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lunn.ch header.s=20171124 header.b=uIP37FQG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932581AbeCEWlk (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:41:40 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:48146 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752856AbeCEWlj (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:41:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=xq3x/xsWZ1nYATcjQ4HHT6gNNAJ00iu46te+kVURsEo=; b=uIP37FQGxrf1aw6P/6cc1Z2i9wkPdR22O2aj3UePzN7RPMFwrjmjIsJmHQACN2lXhxUHvYf9qiz/iAV/W3A0PCfUTqC1smCisfDxuT7XI2Nlmoue+HFMnWum82X75aImguUb0x/+zGsPvo8kwjok0lcuMQlyCLq7p5VGXZxYoBA=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1esynO-0004cK-Pi; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 23:41:26 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 23:41:26 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Brandon Streiff Cc: Vivien Didelot , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] dt-bindings: net: dsa: marvell: describe compatibility string Message-ID: <20180305224126.GB17529@lunn.ch> References: <1520287522-308-1-git-send-email-brandon.streiff@ni.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1520287522-308-1-git-send-email-brandon.streiff@ni.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:05:22PM -0600, Brandon Streiff wrote: > There are two compatibility strings for mv88e6xxx, but it isn't clear > from the documentation why only those two exist when the mv88e6xxx driver > supports more than the 6085 and 6190. Briefly describe how the compatible > property is used, and provide guidance on which to use. > > The model list comes from looking at port_base_addr values (0x0 vs 0x10) > in drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c. > > Signed-off-by: Brandon Streiff Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew