Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp3349796wrg; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 19:55:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuYz0cpuP/9A57vTjEPPK3Yp5RxHCmzKPCm5vCJ4unQYUzP+c0ZUVnEAOx4YAOemi6xAwqu X-Received: by 10.98.35.195 with SMTP id q64mr17347332pfj.161.1520308551255; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 19:55:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520308551; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oV5m5NBebSWPYMMnhJu7bepSg6pMTQ8NZMuvHU4pT25Xuie+tXrr42lRe6JgfholKQ 9OOY37GVfNuL88++hpUg6qQo0zpDBhg3g5NIVv/TJkMTHpefLmzKE8DQhfEfTKombiwO oERWBnhLVhrfj1pOXM9N/mbmJQe/dPmmuGo6ArHuobkbDNtTALABTDZ2eSKl3NQiZYwv LtJ4GRMQzF/rzHNg+RWe2JGLWAuwhA615Nv8MAAgXrMW5MKBIYwQ9grWZ0TOLASu8ijy 58tFJSu9kn/Msu5F+iKiqUBh6hiQDEsl54vQSWFQuegNx4wQYyVvqthkkUD36lgdlt/F oIHA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=V/ndIfQprc0hv80uo9uusfnYIOEaQqkLY61Pb675FEI=; b=faWQbPALgJFiZ8q48nbUraRhOmMEs11AGZiGk1D0UIIRxedsq18ahPSVAcqlRBNou4 wHx5Qav5rcJGFbyuU638RaMRzNN1ain/FziNc9K4lbZilxqoztQzkTZYAc5J3SKeW9lI E49AOUi4OGbNrEMUN47qYONJUZSQexsMsYP4idRC2WyNFv7eJy9JpXM2uBs39gDtHCOl 5uhiSk7l/GDWdkUzHz1sD1UvAK1eVePmdR80fLP39l56nHeJfAi+/9uJUNyp6C9hHafi rndt4sz7bpyeLqTWBGbvo73WT1GAxdrkQATAHTJVKXgsOP1//tLGn8o/e1/hAFBMSVH4 Us7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o15si9182681pgd.23.2018.03.05.19.55.35; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 19:55:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932287AbeCFDyg (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 22:54:36 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:47079 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753024AbeCFDyf (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 22:54:35 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Mar 2018 19:54:34 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,430,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="35773316" Received: from theros.lm.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.232.112.164]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2018 19:54:34 -0800 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 20:54:34 -0700 From: Ross Zwisler To: Dan Williams Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Johannes Thumshirn , Ross Zwisler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libnvdimm: remove redundant __func__ in dev_dbg Message-ID: <20180306035434.GC15227@linux.intel.com> References: <152029856149.39547.12704338925946035297.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <152029856149.39547.12704338925946035297.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:09:21PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > Dynamic debug can be instructed to add the function name to the debug > output using the +f switch, so there is no need for the libnvdimm > modules to do it again. If a user decides to add the +f switch for > libnvdimm's dynamic debug this results in double prints of the function > name. > > Reported-by: Johannes Thumshirn > Reported-by: Ross Zwisler > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > --- > drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c | 3 +- > drivers/nvdimm/btt_devs.c | 21 ++++++++-------- > drivers/nvdimm/bus.c | 13 +++++----- > drivers/nvdimm/claim.c | 2 +- > drivers/nvdimm/core.c | 4 ++- > drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c | 5 ++-- > drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c | 7 ++--- > drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c | 38 ++++++++++++----------------- > drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 25 +++++++++---------- > drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 2 +- > 11 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c > index e068d72b4357..df17f1cd696d 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c > @@ -176,8 +176,7 @@ static void set_badblock(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int num) > (u64) s * 512, (u64) num * 512); > /* this isn't an error as the hardware will still throw an exception */ > if (badblocks_set(bb, s, num, 1)) > - dev_info_once(bb->dev, "%s: failed for sector %llx\n", > - __func__, (u64) s); > + dev_info_once(bb->dev, "failed for sector %llx\n", (u64) s); I don't think you should remove this one. dev_info_once() is just a printk(), and doesn't inherit the +f flag from the dynamic debugging code. The __func__ here does add value. The rest of these look correct, though I think you missed one in each of nvdimm_map_release() and validate_dimm(). (I made these changes as well, but you sent out your patch first. :)