Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
To:     davem@davemloft.net, shuah@kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] selftest: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support
Date:   Tue,  6 Mar 2018 16:10:04 +0100
Message-Id: <20180306151004.31336-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support.  The
test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a
pass.

Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
index 365c32e84189..9245c14165b7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
@@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ int main(void)
 {
 	int *rcv_fd, nodes;
 
-	if (numa_available() < 0)
-		error(1, errno, "no numa api support");
+	if (numa_available() < 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "no numa api support");
+		return 0;
+	}
 
 	nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;
 
-- 
2.11.0