Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp5209294wrg; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 08:02:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuLACo/AOd8P4Q9J3/MBnrHgWocaZJ/pxlVDeUsH3xSb3HbGjBOeOK+TCtR5rqqxL+mVCTJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:608e:: with SMTP id s14-v6mr10923451plj.67.1520438557130; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:02:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520438557; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OU3TfPF6LScCVjinIFviEm+bPXrripxtDASoLE21sItd+7E/sPjsB/yY4nJ91k+UZ1 3GFw6ysTRl6Lt1b2zphQshRkUKK8jdY8LUvqgxbm5RdFoNNeAivCGv8OSB0zi6MUV1gl LQWpK8E7VUfmpQzylXbUUDpnLuKCjOuYWgEGlsZPBpTAgQTyu8Y9ynvklpCQyHnsqDvL W0O87UvVOjSe8qfq4jTdH0wbzxdKYgKBMedfLtgTydeAYvU8mkE7RMYSoow72GHtp100 cfMe29ZoG8OS7jO7R0u3PyeNzIvQ2b3kk8SsMUsrz2WOQKYIiMazG01Oq3xnWMZrn8jE vsQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=uXHyx8bacymbetJXI40EdEa+p5Xb2x4kJuFuy+VpUvI=; b=F52Ck4V2UHuZ1It1ODvClP/CHTU1OO83Yysa8AgdoAcFY37SEdrcmwj9+bPMsPMT4m LionnUieFSpIi2mTESdk6XEGGAzKkRBqMZOX/ALFdnxb3I/RONcQ7+rvGPA/3kEwepwL F6eNuckdst0vP9+nZxbZiuO4hyB9gRnB2FvjFe/r+72eC24frf1rPG9K35qeAvZxpZ4a Qio6SJcODerppmNhjHN+uE5vJqg2+uUk4+ZT+Sy9GwFHjqG9933Oc4QG2wJZvBZRRQnf GBcREEQ0JEI/UjGwLNBFwFtCrqrHXbFE3ivH7kvPNUDSg4xUfhv1bLbJx1B1qx8eJxXz Bqyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p75si14006590pfi.293.2018.03.07.08.02.22; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:02:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933944AbeCGQBB (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Mar 2018 11:01:01 -0500 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]:54063 "EHLO relay1.mentorg.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933555AbeCGQA6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2018 11:00:58 -0500 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:256) id 1etbUs-0006mZ-Ox from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:00:54 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.87) by SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 16:00:51 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1etbUo-0007YF-ON; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 16:00:50 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 16:00:50 +0000 From: Joseph Myers X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk To: Arnd Bergmann CC: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , GNU C Library , linux-arch , , Henrik Grindal Bakken , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Helmut Grohne Subject: Re: RFC: remove the "tile" architecture from glibc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1a57be83-3349-5450-ee4f-d2a33569a728@mellanox.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.87] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-02.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.2) To SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Do you have any updates on this? A related question has come up > for the kernel, as are in the process of removing a number of architectures, > https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/748074/119aaf0d62b3e6c1/ or > see https://lwn.net/Articles/748074/ for a nice summary. No-one has posted glibc test results for 2.27 or 2.26, despite the prior claims of interest in keeping the glibc port. If the kernel port is removed, my assumption is that we should remove the glibc port at that point (not keep it around for possible use with older kernels). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com