Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 9 Mar 2018 02:40:20 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc:     Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: xfrm: use preempt-safe this_cpu_read() in
 ipcomp_alloc_tfms()
Message-ID: <20180308184020.GA10422@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20180307192416.233202-1-ghackmann@google.com>
 <20180308073328.GA8111@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <feddabcd-61c5-a1ef-8c1e-6e3f1d71a9b9@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <feddabcd-61c5-a1ef-8c1e-6e3f1d71a9b9@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 08:31:47AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Because that would not be nice.
> 
> this_cpu_read() is faster than going through raw_smp_processor_id() and
> per_cpu_ptr()

I see.  In that case I have no objections to this patch.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt