Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270248AbTHGQkU (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:40:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269583AbTHGQkR (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:40:17 -0400 Received: from pix-525-pool.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:15687 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270384AbTHGQic (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:38:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:41:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Jason Baron X-X-Sender: jbaron@dhcp64-178.boston.redhat.com To: Alan Cox cc: Rene Mayrhofer , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: pivot_root solved by patch to 2.4.22-pre7 In-Reply-To: <1060271448.3123.75.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 880 Lines: 25 On 7 Aug 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > On Iau, 2003-08-07 at 16:26, Jason Baron wrote: > > it clearly makes a difference. > > > > the unshare_files change causes init to no longer share the same fd table > > with the other kernel threads. thus, when init closes or opens fds it does > > Ah yes.. because of do_basic_setup. Having /sbin/init sharing with > kernel threads doesn't actually strike me as too clever anyway although > none of them should be using fd stuff. > > In which case I guess we should call unshare_files directly before we > open /dev/console in init/main.c. > ok, but what if we re-exec init a couple of times? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/