Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp185352wrg; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:21:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsa4kt6O7HGdhr06sxLbTGdr4pWc8NcSzxI6kv5KRq2rxzi2YkaYNK02djC7QWqrAizZBhp X-Received: by 10.99.110.131 with SMTP id j125mr22583844pgc.382.1520551287477; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:21:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520551287; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RpQBHuxcywKrY6pOOr6crNkS9rd/5WLRESH8Qw+e2J7LPeBj2zToiXd7pdwMY2UFw4 9x6Y5bkDTQ/jDtjQAPWHRLcpwxSWwsYDbyZiH2r57yCgDjrYKF+Vq+NTvTp1/sxvB18k F5ymgOYsdJAj4Ct7TAauDpt31Bkn6QCBQe47k8J+L0/6NzI0nN0KeuQJnXSrQlwqb5A7 rQ1zs/doYrzO3V5pcd9gykRcGR7fRNWXQRApRQ2SvrKbzJXEAgxA58LSQzfzktaNyDQ+ 2ZscjhPtmqdRtAOHbaYIRVHheI+fKla0UWEbP+VTYMYSTBuLziSfF6CcJWe+7oDKdXsf uwCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=kMZLtQEX26DuJfmCCGUvUY1jonnvuaE3aq2S5lCCyCs=; b=vM3oJ1DXO/3lA4d6D3hbTFTjoepwleoCYdnArhEhAaAXk73Zbm3DSEiPrre9SKFmy3 4W9zJucW0wZbXLUgd6rYBhuZCmPhzWcJoGxyw7p9F1gwCxtnNprxG7FtJ8EJdpWl3R4n 9JJw/zdFdPonDF+fc5VHNOieioA4BdH6x3XUw6UGygivcQx+mlSBA3HsmgeOs95LdhLN 0dlUKuSavFq/1Y783lAuzpU16/1KpSUlMGuv9CzWibR3UKBBdLo2t5kdGSg9nulnkIYW kXwvkYhqwPdwRC44yPhaW7omFp1dytqehOzZI2owaS6rNxWdur59AnvtNDYRxwiRc2WE MHpQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m8-v6si15231411plt.501.2018.03.08.15.21.12; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:21:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751212AbeCHXUN (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:20:13 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:39958 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750824AbeCHXUM (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:20:12 -0500 Received: from p4fea5f09.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.95.9] helo=nanos.glx-home) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eu4pV-0004vg-FP; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:20:09 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 00:20:09 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ming Lei cc: Artem Bityutskiy , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Laurence Oberman Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible In-Reply-To: <20180308133440.GA2713@ming.t460p> Message-ID: References: <20180308105358.1506-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <1520515113.20980.31.camel@gmail.com> <20180308133440.GA2713@ming.t460p> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Ming Lei wrote: > Actually, it isn't a real fix, the real one is in the following two: > > 0c20244d458e scsi: megaraid_sas: fix selection of reply queue > ed6d043be8cd scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue Where are these commits? Neither Linus tree not -next know anything about them.... > This patchset can't guarantee that all IRQ vectors are assigned by one > online CPU, for example, in a quad-socket system, if only one processor > is present, then some of vectors are still assigned by all offline CPUs, > and it is a valid case, but still may cause io hang if drivers(hpsa, > megaraid_sas) select reply queue in current way. So my understanding is that these irq patches are enhancements and not bug fixes. I'll queue them for 4.17 then. Thanks, tglx