Received: by 10.223.185.111 with SMTP id b44csp106216wrg; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:51:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELs8QPdFVMtikA790Zmbk7gtGMt86tth6l60oyCppaM0F7VIhPJHcLeX1aRaVMRmmT+CXjtj X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:654a:: with SMTP id d10-v6mr26548414pln.117.1520589093367; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 01:51:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520589093; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bqsoGCQGIc63p4p7JfYLO0qye7IkNMohjYEB89WGG0tq63pXz/5HV52Kmb6zaGJPdS esD/42pp/eQqEQDNBSvjbx4j2/DRtvVBkL6ZSIiQoo01wI8zQkuHUjPt2LoTZ+k9pZs5 XEytHqK5qUjO9LBhMHNMbjTOMlJjAVLbmp6oxuJQnN2sDuntTFUz1KQWsuxIRor28Pjm TOCIxc3nyhiVyIsTDVbWgEaf/5+ML9t4vkNPYTlct7tt04Ue6c00HbSiHwt/Hi3DIZ2B x2ySGOULsKqPZhTHWlmyubMV5qVVgtiaXpe7GAWDIWD5e2M2Jvw4ohP3xsWyUHXSjTCs 2Idw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=YzzV2ZfJtrvlAwW7riFOxJwDqkk9DsH/uhHThsrwcAU=; b=ZU5uhnGvfiaagBEnIRbTidbGroFvHKCrLMWWsZIxMGBBegdfvuQ07hPJv1vnO9uxDn o7lP2iAvWLyCRZIlNqEO4/35dnFF9HMGLRUA+HCZ7rQBLkqD/Vx3Rtg0oC+nfDY3J3+K /oVZMtuy61Qwm800XFRBBsUYuInZzGZ54LTNTLLuuD0VrOSsE52Jq8IYIdxz8bzWfV7J O6f3WniLrogWuIBMKmJTC0/4Vck4DPGWiH4cKCg031KCHmazGweFSPrBDLvxDFmhbKUx SVp41RoZQUqujZRXsLGTDGefx5EVMv65WJVD17/mg9e9rOfoa7u4ra57r+kxw8nbmYJ0 viQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=ER+VF6pz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d30-v6si582928pld.452.2018.03.09.01.51.18; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 01:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=ER+VF6pz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751301AbeCIJuE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 04:50:04 -0500 Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.16]:47797 "EHLO fllnx209.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751277AbeCIJuA (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 04:50:00 -0500 Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by fllnx209.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id w299nxX0012973; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 03:49:59 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1520588999; bh=dQGrn2AUAAv7W+FiS7xWJVKIrAJ7U/rJYzUCudL+vfs=; h=Subject:From:To:CC:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ER+VF6pzOtkztMl39xcJM1y3KCV38gaK7gGll+2idoLrb3+pdGOKrZ+SzKgEUD386 yEHjj4OQOz9h83gfMoYnmXJTkZvZuTSK9Vf4FO1GWgbzOWjy9JSVJJjC1UHAEVZNrD RlLwuU3kNqMs4GcBiwCK7uXyQKewHGWjuROB4fKU= Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (dlee110.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.21]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w299nxva001494; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 03:49:59 -0600 Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1261.35; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 03:49:58 -0600 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1261.35 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 03:49:58 -0600 Received: from [192.168.2.6] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w299nvn4029516; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 03:49:57 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume From: Roger Quadros To: Felipe Balbi , Baolin Wang CC: USB , LKML References: <1519730526-22274-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <87sh9l5z4l.fsf@linux.intel.com> <94cd6377-1327-2309-8d69-6ab0de2bdfd4@ti.com> <87po4i3o1v.fsf@linux.intel.com> <87k1uq3ho6.fsf@linux.intel.com> <8ec0485e-89af-568b-e34a-b0cd490817d0@ti.com> <87h8puwyn5.fsf@linux.intel.com> <5bc56ef5-66b1-d40c-1639-e748fe18cdbd@ti.com> <87muzha9h4.fsf@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <2b0a25a3-e720-136c-106f-42515247ec8a@ti.com> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:49:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/03/18 11:26, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 09/03/18 11:23, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Roger Quadros writes: >> >> >> >>>>> When we set up the DWC3_DEPCMD_ENDTRANSFER command in >>>>> dwc3_stop_active_transfer(), we can do not set DWC3_DEPCMD_CMDIOC, >>>>> then there will no endpoint command complete interrupts I think. >>>>> >>>>> cmd |= DWC3_DEPCMD_CMDIOC; >>>> >>>> I remember some part of the databook mandating CMDIOC to be set. We >>>> could test it out without and see if anything blows up. I would, >>>> however, require a lengthy comment explaining that we're deviating from >>>> databook revision x.yya, section foobar because $reasons. :-) >>>> >>> >>> This is what the v3.10 databook says >>> >>> "When issuing an End Transfer command, software must set the CmdIOC >>> bit (field 8) so that an Endpoint Command Complete event is generated >>> after the transfer ends. This is necessary to synchronize the >>> conclusion of system bus traffic before the End Transfer command is >>> completed." >>> >>> with a note >>> >>> "If GUCTL2[Rst_actbitlater] is set, Software can poll the completion >>> of the End Transfer command by polling the command active bit to be >>> cleared to 0." >>> >>> fyi. >>> >>> Rst_actbitlater - "Enable clearing of the command active bit for the >>> ENDXFER command after the command execution is completed. This bit is >>> valid in device mode only." >>> >>> So I'd prefer not to clear CMDIOC for all cases. >>> >>> Could we some how just tackle the dwc3_gadget_exit case like I did in >>> this patch? >> >> if you can send a version that doesn't iterate over all endpoints twice, >> sure. We still need a comment somewhere, and I fear we may get >> interrupts later in some cases. How would we deal with that? >> > > how about explicitly masking that interrupt? Is it possible? > Other easy option is to use wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout() instead of wait_event_lock_irq() in dwc3_gadget_stop(). Is a 200ms timeout sufficient? And after the first timeout we assume all will timeout so no point in waiting 200ms for each endpoint. -- cheers, -roger Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki