Received: by 10.223.185.111 with SMTP id b44csp514015wrg; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:40:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvCxkfYNo/tRSlike9DqNt+Ym71wr4bMy3uZjrhHRYnIzABvwjsxx3XXMTxvNYdqMGj/DWw X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:24a5:: with SMTP id w34-v6mr27833460pla.221.1520613607341; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 08:40:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520613607; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ve+g2w7BWLZ1xH5qV49lYgXqEMF8wwSf4Gm/v5QoSXlQLIh/fKmJxtny+EsYM05Xd7 s7GQNZ9lpmUzpkw4ntRQtzaEqrExXVBbx390gh8y4nm8/+Ca3iAjaUIXSp8KlXBwA5kq evWb+wEEH6gjDsKxwX+zE0TTYWzgJF60XBIxpMlrg4bAM9xwATTdrQKMju2zt+whaJp1 9mKw0NaWxndQmXKVagkAXsXxFHRsuy/g6AN+Md4OeyuyreB9SoW3tzcrznH3/QEYiiRM 35D1/g6Q+s7WbgYX7Sx4nK+paA6tN+WKjQE0krSEUuXLgv5t2eumDZFaxYDbMTKoUSdg g6ZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=MxB57QTLt3PapRzNRbSXhE63iHqK0KfVaECvjwwizFY=; b=0xi+OF5kTUKlCSISncbb8ctej9O7TnMNyVSFjMzAgUQattKwaSqMouRDDB8XYpzGzS qjRAo4MlBY7ExF6WG8QTP71q3mYyhPBFHzdGjOl95y31LvMZAbW3qu0u3ymz0e3C1Q+B U3o53+CRTBQ0TmEVnn7KtP/m82sV7k7NcMWkLGvXuxzvv29K5NqwOMMYtuJoLX5xt/kI 8Rymgp2cZRru00EozBeQDE2eSdsUig7PL4CtV0G4oeZs+vKb7KEKC9T5k3COJkhu9Nsn biM/7UhJEIHnnMSGzIxxkZaGxx7TxX6Fw6ZXqh57OaZ8kF9aYHacAKezQc99sglOa54s +gEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f13si921013pgp.666.2018.03.09.08.39.52; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 08:40:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932196AbeCIQhU (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:37:20 -0500 Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.66]:45199 "EHLO outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751159AbeCIQhT (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:37:19 -0500 Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from ) id <1euL1A-000NB8-Jo>; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 17:37:16 +0100 Received: from p5dc15542.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.193.85.66] helo=[192.168.178.74]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (envelope-from ) id <1euL1A-0034Gh-D6>; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 17:37:16 +0100 Subject: Re: RFC: remove the "tile" architecture from glibc To: Joseph Myers Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Helmut Grohne , GNU C Library , linux-arch , metcalf@alum.mit.edu, Henrik Grindal Bakken , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1a57be83-3349-5450-ee4f-d2a33569a728@mellanox.com> <20180307181407.GA24350@alf.mars> <9a60ac70-21e4-3f48-5cd7-ffd3aabc5c21@physik.fu-berlin.de> From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Message-ID: <224c8996-bda1-5e75-bff3-9ed8abc4de87@physik.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:37:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 93.193.85.66 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/09/2018 05:31 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > Note that SH glibc test results need some work - there are a large number > of failures listed at . > Probably most could be addressed with the NaN fixes I outlined at > - but that > does of course need someone to do the work to implement that in GCC and > glibc. (The stdlib/tst-tininess failure is stranger; SH manuals don't > seem very specific on this, but the existing setting was definitely > determined by testing on hardware. SH experts with access to a range of > different hardware may be needed to advise on what different hardware does > or is supposed to do in this regard.) Ok, thanks for the explanation. On a sidenote: Is there documentation somewhere which explains how to properly run the glibc testsuite? I would then go ahead and run it on my Amiga 4000 for m68k. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913