Received: by 10.223.185.111 with SMTP id b44csp905215wrg; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 16:30:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtsRC4NpKykGjtyOSv3a2mA175COkWr/cBvGjmNDpyBzPIe3vMxLUbxg0jJInaovGDFGwNw X-Received: by 10.99.109.79 with SMTP id i76mr279375pgc.402.1520641812546; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:30:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520641812; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mYx964/swaf6h/3egizapE1afwRsevcvWXEpLHB2tTzNCNT6ZhtMFFWcbuAzF4Ak0t c8DdmQk5qAd69T9qUbAAQNmqePEQOyw36DZdz2HYmiT7S8lRHS5dm+FxL6zWYa24P8Ea JVDFf+BujbhItoIXmeiE7p8kwE+OPNFoNrQ7W6g9vw3hsrnUucurG/JKqe1tD+qTvscb gW/hTDyvbrBaSNc1bTwWaAivpT2JFvbEGEbpllG0KJ0X7rLDAmWVv5RFOfo09AkXBX3l lG9CwgWS8PC5ix3PP6ceKgAWNErGuftHX/xTQoGIuq9tlIYv6XHJYt6zsnCKPvFH2aGC x3+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=6gi97wqf9jL0kzUZzFsDMgLRwV/sF0ABzgVWmSZ1LW8=; b=D0DSld7ys3MC2ljKehONdx05NLI378bjSor6/CfOQhIoBYVgmOrbiGDN6paiw0m4Gt eVnRZ/0Y8XtI0FCv5vX6nlqhd5B6tIr02zME1uSmhBcmWDwDNOlX7GmfMp5vLvYQmx+h kZwkfJauYm6q+lFWjPZU3zvCkUFIWaqQ08JbOSFyoqlsNThlFkIIaRtRnuHh4GenQIol kGLhznkRrTNArwulJGGtlE4ueT7xrldweshJlVANEAbN3hYlKANacOXfIfrGDHR2urIl a7JcrWkGyCFXVRBcYltw7Ep0H7ud65xOlQjOskjs68M04QuqeKvMr/fiO1KIt80393Eo Blhw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a100-v6si1768415pli.483.2018.03.09.16.29.57; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:30:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934024AbeCJAXE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 19:23:04 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40318 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933647AbeCJAXD (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 19:23:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [185.236.200.248]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FDA8119C; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 00:23:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov Subject: [PATCH 4.9 61/65] bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 16:19:01 -0800 Message-Id: <20180310001830.195082624@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.2 In-Reply-To: <20180310001824.927996722@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180310001824.927996722@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Daniel Borkmann [ upstream commit a493a87f38cfa48caaa95c9347be2d914c6fdf29 ] Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution, we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop. The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]). JIT dump after patch: # bpftool p d x i 1 0: (18) r2 = map[id:1] 2: (b7) r3 = 0 3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 4: (b7) r0 = 2 5: (95) exit With CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000072 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000072 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+ 66: pause | 68: lfence | 6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 | 6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) | 71: retq | 72: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case + retpoline for indirect jump Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000063 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000063 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: jmpq *%rax |- 63: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case - plain indirect jump as before [0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886 [1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 9 ++++---- 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h @@ -177,4 +177,41 @@ static inline void indirect_branch_predi } #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ + +/* + * Below is used in the eBPF JIT compiler and emits the byte sequence + * for the following assembly: + * + * With retpolines configured: + * + * callq do_rop + * spec_trap: + * pause + * lfence + * jmp spec_trap + * do_rop: + * mov %rax,(%rsp) + * retq + * + * Without retpolines configured: + * + * jmp *%rax + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE +# define RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE 17 +# define RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT() \ + EMIT1_off32(0xE8, 7); /* callq do_rop */ \ + /* spec_trap: */ \ + EMIT2(0xF3, 0x90); /* pause */ \ + EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAE, 0xE8); /* lfence */ \ + EMIT2(0xEB, 0xF9); /* jmp spec_trap */ \ + /* do_rop: */ \ + EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x04, 0x24); /* mov %rax,(%rsp) */ \ + EMIT1(0xC3); /* retq */ +#else +# define RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE 2 +# define RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT() \ + EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE0); /* jmp *%rax */ +#endif + #endif /* _ASM_X86_NOSPEC_BRANCH_H_ */ --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly; @@ -281,7 +282,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **ppro EMIT2(0x89, 0xD2); /* mov edx, edx */ EMIT3(0x39, 0x56, /* cmp dword ptr [rsi + 16], edx */ offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries)); -#define OFFSET1 43 /* number of bytes to jump */ +#define OFFSET1 (41 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE) /* number of bytes to jump */ EMIT2(X86_JBE, OFFSET1); /* jbe out */ label1 = cnt; @@ -290,7 +291,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **ppro */ EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, -STACKSIZE + 36); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp - 516] */ EMIT3(0x83, 0xF8, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); /* cmp eax, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT */ -#define OFFSET2 32 +#define OFFSET2 (30 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE) EMIT2(X86_JA, OFFSET2); /* ja out */ label2 = cnt; EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */ @@ -304,7 +305,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **ppro * goto out; */ EMIT3(0x48, 0x85, 0xC0); /* test rax,rax */ -#define OFFSET3 10 +#define OFFSET3 (8 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE) EMIT2(X86_JE, OFFSET3); /* je out */ label3 = cnt; @@ -317,7 +318,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **ppro * rdi == ctx (1st arg) * rax == prog->bpf_func + prologue_size */ - EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE0); /* jmp rax */ + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT(); /* out: */ BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt - label1 != OFFSET1);