Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:14:35 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>, ak@linux.intel.com,
        karahmed@amazon.de, pbonzini@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm: Give each mm a unique ID
Message-ID: <20180310011435.GA27284@kroah.com>
References: <cover.1520026221.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
 <3351ba53a3b570ba08f2a0f5a59d01b7d80a8955.1520026221.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
 <20180307173036.GJ7097@kroah.com>
 <9b0d1195-23bd-5bf9-0dd8-b2ca29165bbb@linux.intel.com>
 <8322b21f-5ee7-41a6-7897-d73faa0ece27@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8322b21f-5ee7-41a6-7897-d73faa0ece27@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 05:04:39PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> On 03/08/2018 10:23 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On 03/07/2018 09:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 01:32:09PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> >>> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> >>> commit: f39681ed0f48498b80455095376f11535feea332
> >>>
> >>> This adds a new variable to mmu_context_t: ctx_id.
> >>> ctx_id uniquely identifies the mm_struct and will never be reused.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >>> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> >>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> >>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> >>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> >>> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> >>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> >>> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/413a91c24dab3ed0caa5f4e4d017d87b0857f920.1498751203.git.luto@kernel.org
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h         | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >>>  arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h |  5 +++++
> >>>  arch/x86/mm/tlb.c                  |  2 ++
> >>>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Does not apply to 4.4.y :(
> >>
> >> Can you provide a working backport for that tree?
> >>
> > 
> > Okay. Will do.  Thanks.
> > 
> 
> 
> Greg,
> 
> I actually found that there are a number of dependent IBPB related patches that haven't been
> backported yet to 4.4:
> 
>     x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD feature bits for Speculation Control
>     (cherry picked from commit 5d10cbc91d9eb5537998b65608441b592eec65e7)
> 
>     x86/msr: Add definitions for new speculation control MSRs
>     (cherry picked from commit 1e340c60d0dd3ae07b5bedc16a0469c14b9f3410)
> 
>     x86/speculation: Add basic IBPB (Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier) support
>     (cherry picked from commit 20ffa1caecca4db8f79fe665acdeaa5af815a24d)
> 
>     x86/cpufeatures: Clean up Spectre v2 related CPUID flags
>     (cherry picked from commit 2961298efe1ea1b6fc0d7ee8b76018fa6c0bcef2)
> 
> And probably and a few more.
> You have plans to backport these patches?

I don't, but I think someone from Amazon was looking into it, but I
haven't heard from them in a few weeks.  I'll gladly take patches if you
have them, or at the worse case, a list like above of the git commits
that are missing.

thanks,

greg k-h