Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp71792imn; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:06:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELve2I9tRKo1roSUFzDg5hf+3b++GTwrG2t12sIUrUdOvkPzmfM1BvxEduEQsUtN52P5vmWj X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8d8d:: with SMTP id v13-v6mr3302756plo.149.1520863571050; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:06:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520863571; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hjmLh3Mvzc9hgfV030VAIEVxPwxSf1S3QnoqSWAmYMgL+vnwDOW1Ykcc4au9mG8YQW pc91UGWSu/Ni059sfo+jwW6NIqzvVEhYI1+fr1POrZ1oqXfHJH1q6Ry3ysM5GK83D3aQ txFy3mwRCGE2YHg/aSMxRKW2HP9qlHLNsItc542zTky3S1CEps34jRB5eusPTo6kp+DE JEJtVlz7YOawIeV+S95hanW/qX6+uz4ykktmt6kQIsz2X90Q5ZvwNLdEWZqoT6W3A57t 6Puh6CpLYlAnBnamUCVVDmR5AY5JKwOlJCGkg/j3BuuAdapQSG8a03RovJQ32eICqHjr ooTQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=AEv8v0DKP9lHsENkwe++w0We/zdBkiQKisu+XNDutOs=; b=mRbDN8GU4im4EAbN7+oO62anGEx+X/AzgrFkcYUSSFcf/iSRyioh0jiD1q8RF0y4Hw 22ZVaPEpBcosPefajBIcc3W6sLZtvhsLFPLABbyeUC7hVNlbjTq4bRRO0BFOtmx1tPV8 +SWtl5oiy0RZdz088k1v8vxnIaiHEvnTQ4kwht7A76iWDgbjQAutvWWUCPIHQhnGmVUB +rHpSkzWrI64prJgFJkKsFhX8AIexeC/7wexYmta3aq68JWe1MDFR3ozjEcJmrDqcQNz ar0LOHNFisjikFRIQHPNSmSNHS07qnIdUO/mjq9IJ2JHdCu5vbSnLJmomY9U6B1BklpE tAjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c12-v6si324786pll.498.2018.03.12.07.05.55; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932377AbeCLODO (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:03:14 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:59434 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932343AbeCLODK (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:03:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (67.110.78.66.ptr.us.xo.net [67.110.78.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 162701017B461; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:03:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20180312.100306.1226474832894044539.davem@davemloft.net> To: dvyukov@google.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: LKML admins (syzbot emails are not delivered) From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20180308.150309.1043571795208899259.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 09:56:42 +0100 > But I don't see kernelci.orgbot referenced anywhere in the emails. > E.g. in the one that was linked above: > https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=syzkaller-bugs/OkwLGoS6UQA/hHAtCdnNBgAJ I'm not referencing that one above, I'm simply reporting what I've seen in the vger bounce logs. > Could a dot in email address produce the same result? E.g. > To: foo.bar@something.com No. > Is it possible to revive autoanswer@vger.kernel.org? It would > hopefully allow us to debug this without bothering you. Sorry, no engineering resources will be put into the current setup as we prepare a new system based upon mailman.