Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: Fix IMA Kconfig for dependencies on ARM64
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org>, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
        jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Safford <david.safford@ge.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:58:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180312215957.GI24717@ziepe.ca>
References: <1520400386-17674-1-git-send-email-anjiandi@codeaurora.org>
         <20180307185132.GA30102@ziepe.ca>
         <1520448953.10396.565.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <1520449719.5558.28.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1520450495.10396.587.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <1520451662.24314.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1520461156.10396.654.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <191cfd49-0c66-a5ef-3d2b-b6c4132aa294@codeaurora.org>
         <1520615461.12216.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1520891598.3547.190.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <20180312215957.GI24717@ziepe.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <1520895525.3547.226.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 15:59 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:53:18PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> 
> > Using Kconfig to force the TPM to be builtin is not required, but
> > helpful.  Users interested in IMA-measurement could configure the TPM
> > as builtin themselves.  Without the TPM builtin, IMA goes into TPM-
> > bypass mode.
> 
> This issues, broadly speaking, we have lots of TPM drivers, selecting
> only some to actually support IMA shows we have some kind of problem
> here.

True, IMA is not selecting the older TPM vendor specific modules, but
only the newer TPM_TIS and now TPM_CRB modules.  That doesn't imply
that IMA only supports some TPMs.  It means that by default, these
TPMs are builtin.  Anyone building a kernel, can select the vendor
specific TPM to be builtin.

Mimi