Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp89815imn; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:11:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELv68ePxcrM81bEBNxWQeKOPVKZDw255Hyb877csEg/UeJ3IXzIgvj//kW2lXShB1wmm7UiS X-Received: by 10.99.96.130 with SMTP id u124mr8069322pgb.252.1520907105074; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:11:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520907104; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=N2aNHSbD3ra3n5l/erl02yX0Gf6IudKlbY8uZ5mGgscaMkIPO3ggvhN9N6E2ZUJugq KMpHql1ztfvsxOUGBFY1VlotAttDrwS+2iWb5xELc57HDM16LqifmNm4gkzWmthXMxkZ lAdZn/demDZZNCX2ZCKQR5ZQsNlOdlKjSn8isSK7caz4DspGq8Mi+9GgFA4jTiYmA1iu OsakpAnWLZmEYzNTejUUn9nd71g4zlJ4vR/KsskXVOCKGiUrKM/e/RHQOHm1BmGxvmcJ vxZauwL4fNPO7Vl7wXshkTedpb7/5ylj5smZ8CMm4gNFNztj4d9aavhSt8V297/d8LwF Bzxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=72z4jnj0FQAb+2BU9Wx1u1dvwO8GwTncRYjq5JvmRbo=; b=oQYXsZHuQDUvlgDO2gMJZJDsvY2ybtiFOzOrHVdNOTD3A4aJqtfJDqV49mKs80KFVf 9MiH1njuIjZ21u1WWT6N/3p44EpKlNkjs+bTino8VAnJXkw40/dhgPUPdC65kH3gSplN dExVVmP41RqJFUPn5qIg3lTAWbCqSQr9rrqJkY6DGYhskdKmKVDrsxO3j3Zz7Tl2hXxd x/KUgXzM2hddZxY+e3wRDV8/LwuJrT5uhdY2NDaF/M+lq9Vg4dajyBc2WdrmJEi15Woz 4FV6B3v4mpOyZl2bXWTyav/5o2o2kARNsJ4N+Cc7qzvmN9SN3Jl6/lTTyyJ6mXQMutR0 6pAw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bi1-v6si5945210plb.97.2018.03.12.19.11.30; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932343AbeCMCKi (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 22:10:38 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:37239 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932246AbeCMCKh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 22:10:37 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Mar 2018 19:10:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,463,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="24095291" Received: from aaronlu.sh.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.239.159.135]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2018 19:10:34 -0700 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:11:41 +0800 From: Aaron Lu To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Huang Ying , Dave Hansen , Kemi Wang , Tim Chen , Andi Kleen , Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman , Matthew Wilcox , David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/free_pcppages_bulk: update pcp->count inside Message-ID: <20180313021141.GA13782@intel.com> References: <20180301062845.26038-1-aaron.lu@intel.com> <20180301062845.26038-2-aaron.lu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 02:22:28PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 03/01/2018 07:28 AM, Aaron Lu wrote: > > Matthew Wilcox found that all callers of free_pcppages_bulk() currently > > update pcp->count immediately after so it's natural to do it inside > > free_pcppages_bulk(). > > > > No functionality or performance change is expected from this patch. > > Well, it's N decrements instead of one decrement by N / assignment of > zero. But I assume the difference is negligible anyway, right? Yes. > > > Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu > > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Thanks! > > --- > > mm/page_alloc.c | 10 +++------- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index cb416723538f..faa33eac1635 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -1148,6 +1148,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count, > > page = list_last_entry(list, struct page, lru); > > /* must delete as __free_one_page list manipulates */ > > list_del(&page->lru); > > + pcp->count--; > > > > mt = get_pcppage_migratetype(page); > > /* MIGRATE_ISOLATE page should not go to pcplists */ > > @@ -2416,10 +2417,8 @@ void drain_zone_pages(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp) > > local_irq_save(flags); > > batch = READ_ONCE(pcp->batch); > > to_drain = min(pcp->count, batch); > > - if (to_drain > 0) { > > + if (to_drain > 0) > > free_pcppages_bulk(zone, to_drain, pcp); > > - pcp->count -= to_drain; > > - } > > local_irq_restore(flags); > > } > > #endif > > @@ -2441,10 +2440,8 @@ static void drain_pages_zone(unsigned int cpu, struct zone *zone) > > pset = per_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset, cpu); > > > > pcp = &pset->pcp; > > - if (pcp->count) { > > + if (pcp->count) > > free_pcppages_bulk(zone, pcp->count, pcp); > > - pcp->count = 0; > > - } > > local_irq_restore(flags); > > } > > > > @@ -2668,7 +2665,6 @@ static void free_unref_page_commit(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn) > > if (pcp->count >= pcp->high) { > > unsigned long batch = READ_ONCE(pcp->batch); > > free_pcppages_bulk(zone, batch, pcp); > > - pcp->count -= batch; > > } > > } > > > > >