Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp218620imn; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 01:51:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsHiaTlSJdnYql83D7Rkub70t+XEanWX2vXzhtrJmo+4Dm/kyXdvgtPT+XPLHE8sK+L2Y3d X-Received: by 10.101.87.136 with SMTP id b8mr4431749pgr.282.1520931101171; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 01:51:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520931101; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j+ZuScC5WM4kUueFep5ju06MXrX3eIUVsuClFKW/bssb+qn4A6UDy8o1qCMK4cYbjl m2U7SY1vnIYzFOf5Hhz2MvH+dLXATyfXyY6EIjbCMHzsLCb0iMfE1tc7Sn67L78xVZd1 9yxWBb4jnY0ZxtnrUokCF7WG9d+F+OUttfq0H+Ma8xzuIq+CMJMqK/pmT21gkWopBdOb 9lBcP5rfRG+1AKkQZEb+9YOb7OXZ3h/+pvvki8VlZDeVU6cPI/sJGTIXhiq/cCUdshC9 eqw2Qe6rF9ezG5EgiPrBBUL2s6fxX2TGGo/K4cs/5/jzk3pNBAyE3vKo7yD77lMTazTs 8cMQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=2JCarPf/Bs0uOUSawzW5JKZnUSn1sC3NaUSm39rchvs=; b=XPxtbaEOejv7fKZ9m5BBYJv9BBUukt1n732aLVZjqM4JatajDYwL3b4qAb7EwKUT7l q1z/cfYzQ5Ky1qBCOVyT6VUdUWZXRU4/UeTJ3Jna2pTwRNEIuZ+x4tBn75D3aMg9qDi/ qWHhn6NRou5BkpkGom6y/jpMl2k4CK50U4U3tn2mRV8nl1hl+3HNBl8X3R41sUJYL81Q Uj1MXLOXXCRzyHoemsDNUlZjwiXqibkKkgsZrkCt4082dK7oobBPpNwnbSKP1tN8CjTp WJ5af6VkO7C9oAJhOb4MkaBhdBUqhgjgyBgKu+oHqgZvwYOhKsscCu8ooSmnJ7UNe0EW MtRA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p11si6289318pgd.392.2018.03.13.01.51.27; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 01:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932495AbeCMIuT (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 04:50:19 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52614 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752471AbeCMIse (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 04:48:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12258-90.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.71.90]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48626EED; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:48:35 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Jessica Yu , Linus Torvalds , Mimi Zohar , Djalal Harouni , David Miller , Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook , Alexei Starovoitov , Al Viro , Daniel Borkmann , Network Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kernel-team , Linux API Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] modules: allow modprobe load regular elf binaries Message-ID: <20180313084835.GB8901@kroah.com> References: <20180309.135724.452219538059491199.davem@davemloft.net> <81b7599d-aab7-6cb6-7843-64510c8f6260@fb.com> <20180310140843.GP4449@wotan.suse.de> <20180310151652.GV4449@wotan.suse.de> <20180310153431.GW4449@wotan.suse.de> <1f3e2c92-1e09-cc77-3b90-e33d7da35a2f@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1f3e2c92-1e09-cc77-3b90-e33d7da35a2f@fb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:22:00AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 3/10/18 7:34 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Also, > > > > Alexei you never answered my questions out aliases with the umh modules. > > Long term this important to consider. > > aliases always felt like a crutch to me. > I can see an argument when they're used as 'alias pci:* foo' > but the way it's used in networking with ip_set_* and nf-* is > something I prefer not to ever do again. > Definitely no aliases for bpfilter umh. I agree, let's not do that if at all possible for these types of binaries. greg k-h