Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp503569imn; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:06:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtK+w9nY86iF6JXqhxWCo13nsP3Q3GH6YK3ZB9qnGgN828LcvdjTqHGR17GZgXIex8Hy6Kj X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7798:: with SMTP id o24-v6mr1350257pll.52.1520964369739; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:06:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520964369; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JBTL2CyrORFedch3m+LBvtL3KX+bX4KBTs4tTzgbffBvj1Rm639DbxZd/Isw3AOknm uJMwVbsfG9t10zODUPjvS4m/aKUSgPECPyGh0OVVgehRW+0IXfFkOonxO6LM5RAc1q0Q edSw46hfjO/rDpvZJhxtsOTthjU0bXXfT2iOSHjfTIo/vtKWHDM2kGRZLRf0DoYvhCTx mRN3PJmSXdgYD4XhQrh3Mauq/iKcS/CkCY/6DDoklcv3w/NBotYfPNJw3YiNijAVY46Q 6eQUW32KDi4/oktDTyVa8dbgK2OXgjYpXwZnNz5PWffTkQ977CDVbvz4otrQZG3UXIKe 8XlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=3flvEKy5Mgd7yPftyTNSiZFlj5oq3vTSczhuYBZqCzA=; b=ribpKfYy4Xg0tGB2vqSWOObSl7uuebtdLSN8D6BW4G9T9bMdfhXL38mPmj3VlNZHiB kYuSwqumeG/205NfP2FmqD6nuPhXpy8Nttm7TmXCpyEt4UCcd6L9WWXyI44CWnbFR1Qq m++PGZOHourRe4hIqfRJGMnVUw4BjaRofbjWhCdE2eSotesJ7ucp63Rw2zPH1F7E4+yN fapEOmAPbGGPFkTFyqJZ0Zra0g31ZHu422gopb8wzhAh1wjyUWSirp0+QXAejN9xxNPy 8mVW8Nmp+4ZK/u5M0dx5NUbttWw1IKKnMa/3z/qBZvxGceIx+xxnYOXc8L74U58W0QgL 6DmA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z21si540086pfa.33.2018.03.13.11.05.54; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752869AbeCMSEJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:04:09 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:47632 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752681AbeCMSAh (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:00:37 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2DI0Vbq021341 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:00:37 -0400 Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gpjyksag8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:00:36 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:00:33 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.142) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:00:25 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w2DI0OOT52756648; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:00:24 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F1042054; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:52:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B36B4204B; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:52:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nimbus.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com (unknown [9.101.4.33]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:52:39 +0000 (GMT) From: Laurent Dufour To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrea Arcangeli , Alexei Starovoitov , kemi.wang@intel.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, Daniel Jordan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, Tim Chen , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v9 13/24] mm: Introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:59:43 +0100 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1520963994-28477-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1520963994-28477-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18031318-0008-0000-0000-000004DD0196 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18031318-0009-0000-0000-00001E700188 Message-Id: <1520963994-28477-14-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-03-13_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1803130203 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The speculative page fault handler which is run without holding the mmap_sem is calling lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() but the vm_flags is not guaranteed to remain constant. Introducing __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() which has the vma flags value parameter instead of the vma pointer. Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- include/linux/swap.h | 10 ++++++++-- mm/memory.c | 8 ++++---- mm/swap.c | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h index 1985940af479..a7dc37e0e405 100644 --- a/include/linux/swap.h +++ b/include/linux/swap.h @@ -338,8 +338,14 @@ extern void deactivate_file_page(struct page *page); extern void mark_page_lazyfree(struct page *page); extern void swap_setup(void); -extern void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, - struct vm_area_struct *vma); +extern void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, + unsigned long vma_flags); + +static inline void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, + struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + return __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma->vm_flags); +} /* linux/mm/vmscan.c */ extern unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone); diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 412014d5785b..0a0a483d9a65 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -2560,7 +2560,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) ptep_clear_flush_notify(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte); page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(new_page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vmf->vma_flags); /* * We call the notify macro here because, when using secondary * mmu page tables (such as kvm shadow page tables), we want the @@ -3083,7 +3083,7 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) if (unlikely(page != swapcache && swapcache)) { page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags); } else { do_page_add_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, exclusive); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, true, false); @@ -3234,7 +3234,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES); page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags); setpte: set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte, entry); @@ -3486,7 +3486,7 @@ int alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES); page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags); } else { inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, mm_counter_file(page)); page_add_file_rmap(page, false); diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index 3dd518832096..f2f9c587246f 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -455,12 +455,12 @@ void lru_cache_add(struct page *page) * directly back onto it's zone's unevictable list, it does NOT use a * per cpu pagevec. */ -void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, - struct vm_area_struct *vma) +void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, + unsigned long vma_flags) { VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page); - if (likely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED)) + if (likely((vma_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED)) SetPageActive(page); else if (!TestSetPageMlocked(page)) { /* -- 2.7.4