Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp558601imn; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:01:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvOGAFkx+THpG47LWFoLU7g5ZXom3Hd7AiI6uCyrsvqMQolTdjs+w6hZtYsc5w1AMmzfc8N X-Received: by 10.98.34.75 with SMTP id i72mr1712049pfi.165.1520971309821; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:01:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520971309; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MO39ZlwxU/6h/VN6uiSlkkWpw579Wz1bkqw/V7pkYMcaiHUVIUMeGtVNDVRLwOjiQR 6u6EI8NZ/lxBcvYAYWFXTq/VJkabWCf8txfCJDDQ3Fowlb8LW4VK/iAw8CngwlSlQCOm OtjGhwFQXmTBuQOtlYyNuAe5nLQK7/2ErJgNmWYfJliAakR31pmOGZLSAU9eJ2PaHnhV HZ1CJJVhkCdq6xuDTugVipAUSvvQY/Ofkc/AW1nhZdhEdrVaqk51TTalXxk2sYY21KLM PUF/6sGJp9YHEpYpS4TcJu43fjTwMjNFsFmurDnC23OIXyfSd7pWiqmPn9/zH3kufd3D KLBg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=euF/P4qK+pT0M1CbkGUm/YmytvnV2sO2cCoDF6YAl3U=; b=W0aLmn9s/txAAFHbXMbE+QFLrHCslSpMkK8+3cUnZg4mjMSVHpi2yi6+kCmqTxbCTF mG8rA3shhh3qLdvX9S8yqGuPutb5wSXD3VEoZQI5iE9vyaw8oJEFi92QsX4JQoArBFd1 PTyEbJ9zCoz7oOlcs7dHPmPkJEVgJAPpXr6ra3C5at61xvPUcpAxSDT/cw7RnFANWAV7 +m0FlBnz+BqYJjSiGUadgOdcDxEJWscP4ZIxfyEtgmJtBpEL4jRXM3WTjv963aQSlF59 dxX0269gyHoyJa32epHuWE+rLzBVU3UzUuSX2w0e+GAOu034c1YxemGXJS6yF7rPFYaE h3DA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u187si586709pgc.451.2018.03.13.13.01.34; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752397AbeCMUAV (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:00:21 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38518 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751727AbeCMUAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:00:20 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2DJsEIU109194 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:00:19 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gpj5cqydn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:00:19 -0400 Received: from localhost by e33.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:00:18 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.19) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:00:15 -0600 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w2DK0FGE64487596; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:00:15 -0700 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2440B6E038; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:00:15 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [9.85.147.96] (unknown [9.85.147.96]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52686E040; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:00:13 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (ucd9000) Add debugfs attributes to provide mfr_status To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.com, joel@jms.id.au, Christopher Bostic , Andrew Jeffery References: <1520623196-9534-1-git-send-email-eajames@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1520623196-9534-3-git-send-email-eajames@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180313192903.GA14572@roeck-us.net> From: Eddie James Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:00:13 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180313192903.GA14572@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18031320-0008-0000-0000-0000097420A1 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00008667; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000254; SDB=6.01002582; UDB=6.00510159; IPR=6.00781912; MB=3.00020012; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-03-13 20:00:17 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18031320-0009-0000-0000-000046614C23 Message-Id: <3b85f5d8-f974-4914-a2c4-1583adeb1588@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-03-13_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1803130222 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/13/2018 02:29 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:01:51PM -0500, Eddie James wrote: >> >> On 03/10/2018 10:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On 03/09/2018 11:19 AM, Eddie James wrote: >>>> From: Christopher Bostic >>>> >>>> Expose the gpiN_fault fields of mfr_status as individual debugfs >>>> attributes. This provides a way for users to be easily notified of gpi >>>> faults. Also provide the whole mfr_status register in debugfs. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Christopher Bostic >>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery >>>> Signed-off-by: Eddie James >>>> --- >>>>   drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c | 172 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>>>   1 file changed, 171 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c >>>> b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c >>>> index e3a507f..297da0e 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c >>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ >>>>    * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. >>>>    */ >>>>   +#include >>>>   #include >>>>   #include >>>>   #include >>>> @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ >>>>   #define UCD9000_NUM_PAGES        0xd6 >>>>   #define UCD9000_FAN_CONFIG_INDEX    0xe7 >>>>   #define UCD9000_FAN_CONFIG        0xe8 >>>> +#define UCD9000_MFR_STATUS        0xf3 >>>>   #define UCD9000_GPIO_SELECT        0xfa >>>>   #define UCD9000_GPIO_CONFIG        0xfb >>>>   #define UCD9000_DEVICE_ID        0xfd >>>> @@ -63,13 +65,22 @@ >>>>   #define UCD901XX_NUM_GPIOS    26 >>>>   #define UCD90910_NUM_GPIOS    26 >>>>   +#define UCD9000_DEBUGFS_NAME_LEN    24 >>>> +#define UCD9000_GPI_COUNT        8 >>>> + >>>>   struct ucd9000_data { >>>>       u8 fan_data[UCD9000_NUM_FAN][I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX]; >>>>       struct pmbus_driver_info info; >>>>       struct gpio_chip gpio; >>>> +    struct dentry *debugfs; >>>>   }; >>>>   #define to_ucd9000_data(_info) container_of(_info, struct >>>> ucd9000_data, info) >>>>   +struct ucd9000_debugfs_entry { >>>> +    struct i2c_client *client; >>>> +    u8 index; >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>>   static int ucd9000_get_fan_config(struct i2c_client *client, int fan) >>>>   { >>>>       int fan_config = 0; >>>> @@ -328,6 +339,156 @@ static int ucd9000_gpio_direction_output(struct >>>> gpio_chip *gc, >>>>                         val); >>>>   } >>>>   +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) >>>> +static int ucd9000_get_mfr_status(struct i2c_client *client, u8 >>>> *buffer) >>>> +{ >>>> +    int ret = pmbus_set_page(client, 0); >>>> + >>>> +    if (ret < 0) >>>> +        return ret; >>>> + >>>> +    /* >>>> +     * With the ucd90120 and ucd90124 devices, this command >>>> [MFR_STATUS] >>>> +     * is 2 bytes long (bits 0-15).  With the ucd90240 this command is >>>> 5 >>>> +     * bytes long.  With all other devices, it is 4 bytes long. >>>> +     */ >>>> +    return i2c_smbus_read_block_data(client, UCD9000_MFR_STATUS, >>>> buffer); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static int ucd9000_debugfs_show_mfr_status_bit(void *data, u64 *val) >>>> +{ >>>> +    struct ucd9000_debugfs_entry *entry = data; >>>> +    struct i2c_client *client = entry->client; >>>> +    u8 buffer[4]; >>>> +    int ret; >>>> + >>>> +    /* >>>> +     * This attribute is only created for devices that return 4 bytes >>>> for >>>> +     * status_mfr, so it's safe to call with 4-byte buffer. >>>> +     */ >>>> +    ret = ucd9000_get_mfr_status(client, buffer); >>>> +    if (ret < 0) { >>>> +        dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to read mfr status. rc:%d\n", >>>> +            ret); >>>> + >>>> +        return ret; >>>> +    } >>>> + >>>> +    /* >>>> +     * Attribute only created for devices with gpi fault bits at bits >>>> +     * 16-23, which is the second byte of the response. >>>> +     */ >>>> +    *val = !!(buffer[1] & BIT(entry->index)); >>>> + >>>> +    return 0; >>>> +} >>>> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(ucd9000_debugfs_mfr_status_bit, >>>> +             ucd9000_debugfs_show_mfr_status_bit, NULL, "%1lld\n"); >>>> + >>>> +static int ucd9000_debugfs_show_mfr_status_word2(void *data, u64 *val) >>>> +{ >>>> +    struct i2c_client *client = data; >>>> +    __be16 buffer; >>>> +    int ret; >>>> + >>>> +    ret = ucd9000_get_mfr_status(client, (u8 *)&buffer); >>>> +    if (ret < 0) { >>>> +        dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to read mfr status. rc:%d\n", >>>> +            ret); >>>> + >>>> +        return ret; >>>> +    } >>>> + >>>> +    *val = be16_to_cpu(buffer); >>>> + >>>> +    return 0; >>>> +} >>>> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(ucd9000_debugfs_mfr_status_word2, >>>> +             ucd9000_debugfs_show_mfr_status_word2, NULL, >>>> +             "%04llx\n"); >>>> + >>>> +static int ucd9000_debugfs_show_mfr_status_word4(void *data, u64 *val) >>>> +{ >>>> +    struct i2c_client *client = data; >>>> +    __be32 buffer; >>>> +    int ret; >>>> + >>>> +    ret = ucd9000_get_mfr_status(client, (u8 *)&buffer); >>>> +    if (ret < 0) { >>>> +        dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to read mfr status. rc:%d\n", >>>> +            ret); >>>> + >>>> +        return ret; >>>> +    } >>>> + >>>> +    *val = be32_to_cpu(buffer); >>>> + >>>> +    return 0; >>>> +} >>>> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(ucd9000_debugfs_mfr_status_word4, >>>> +             ucd9000_debugfs_show_mfr_status_word4, NULL, >>>> +             "%08llx\n"); >>>> + >>>> +static int ucd9000_init_debugfs(struct i2c_client *client, >>>> +                const struct i2c_device_id *mid, >>>> +                struct ucd9000_data *data) >>>> +{ >>>> +    struct dentry *debugfs; >>>> +    struct ucd9000_debugfs_entry *entries; >>>> +    int i; >>>> +    char name[UCD9000_DEBUGFS_NAME_LEN]; >>>> + >>>> +    debugfs = pmbus_get_debugfs_dir(client); >>>> +    if (!debugfs) >>>> +        return -ENOENT; >>>> + >>>> +    data->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(client->name, debugfs); >>>> +    if (!data->debugfs) >>>> +        return -ENOENT; >>>> + >>>> +    /* >>>> +     * Of the chips this driver supports, only the UCD9090, UCD90160, >>>> +     * and UCD90910 report GPI faults in their MFR_STATUS register, so >>>> only >>>> +     * create the GPI fault debugfs attributes for those chips. >>>> +     */ >>>> +    if (mid->driver_data == ucd9090 || mid->driver_data == ucd90160 || >>>> +        mid->driver_data == ucd90910) { >>>> +        entries = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, >>>> +                       sizeof(*entries) * UCD9000_GPI_COUNT, >>>> +                       GFP_KERNEL); >>>> +        if (!entries) >>>> +            return -ENOMEM; >>>> + >>>> +        for (i = 0; i < UCD9000_GPI_COUNT; i++) { >>>> +            entries[i].client = client; >>>> +            entries[i].index = i; >>>> +            scnprintf(name, UCD9000_DEBUGFS_NAME_LEN, >>>> +                  "gpi%d_alarm", i + 1); >>>> +            debugfs_create_file(name, 0444, data->debugfs, >>>> +                        &entries[i], >>>> +                        &ucd9000_debugfs_mfr_status_bit); >>>> +        } >>>> + >>>> +        scnprintf(name, UCD9000_DEBUGFS_NAME_LEN, "mfr_status"); >>>> +        debugfs_create_file(name, 0444, data->debugfs, client, >>>> +                    &ucd9000_debugfs_mfr_status_word4); >>>> +    } else if (mid->driver_data == ucd90120 || >>>> +           mid->driver_data == ucd90124) { >>>> +        scnprintf(name, UCD9000_DEBUGFS_NAME_LEN, "mfr_status"); >>>> +        debugfs_create_file(name, 0444, data->debugfs, client, >>>> +                    &ucd9000_debugfs_mfr_status_word2); >>>> +    } >>>> + >>>> +    return 0; >>>> +} >>> Is all that complexity really worth it ? Why not just read the >>> manufacturing >>> status as byte string into a buffer and use hexdump to pront it, no matter >>> how >>> many bytes are actually returned ? This would also be less error prone, >>> and >>> automatically support future chips. >> Hm, well then we have the additional complexity of setting up custom debugfs >> file operations to show the binary data instead of just using >> DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE. Plus, at some point someone has to interpret it as >> either a word, half-word, or 5 bytes chunk. Where better to do it than the >> driver, as this is hw-dependent? >> > I can't exactly follow your logic. You mean it is acceptable for the user to > have to look into the datasheet to find out what the 1/2/4 byte hex value means, > but it is unacceptable to expect the user to have to use the datasheet to > identify what a 1..5 byte hex string, displayed in the order received from the > chip, means ? I am having difficulties understanding the difference. How is > 12345678 different from, say, 12 34 56 78 (which you could display as 12345678 > as well) ? Yea, it's not different at all. Sorry, I wasn't very clear, when I said "interpret," I meant "figure out the endian swapping," so my proposal would display 78563412, so the user can directly use the value. I typically expect the kernel to provide data through interfaces in host endian, but displaying it as-received is fine as well. User can figure it out. V2 incoming. Thanks, Eddie > > The macro generates the file operations as part of the define, so I don't see > having to define as valid argument. One could instead add a generic debugfs > macro to display a string if that is of interest. > >> I could just use one function and do a byte-swap based on data length in a >> loop within #ifdef LITTLE_ENDIAN, but that's a little messy. It will handle >> all the cases though. What do you think? >> > Personally I don't see a problem displaying data as received. Either case, there > are functions/macros to convert from big/little endian to host byte order, so > related ifdefs in the code should never be necessary. > > Guenter > >> Thanks, >> Eddie >> >>> Thanks, >>> Guenter >>> >>>> +#else >>>> +static int ucd9000_init_debugfs(struct i2c_client *client, >>>> +                struct ucd9000_data *data) >>>> +{ >>>> +    return 0; >>>> +} >>>> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) */ >>>> + >>>>   static int ucd9000_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >>>>                const struct i2c_device_id *id) >>>>   { >>>> @@ -483,7 +644,16 @@ static int ucd9000_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >>>>           return ret; >>>>       } >>>>   -    return pmbus_do_probe(client, mid, info); >>>> +    ret = pmbus_do_probe(client, mid, info); >>>> +    if (ret) >>>> +        return ret; >>>> + >>>> +    ret = ucd9000_init_debugfs(client, mid, data); >>>> +    if (ret) >>>> +        dev_warn(&client->dev, "Failed to register debugfs: %d\n", >>>> +             ret); >>>> + >>>> +    return 0; >>>>   } >>>>     /* This is the driver that will be inserted */ >>>>