Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp856257imn; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 02:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtCrIHyOzLaI0sYKWN8JNykTnDbOD8f3fzMSpAuNUnYGon4karEYKnZg5PeOc0tjJDOsjNq X-Received: by 10.99.97.130 with SMTP id v124mr3030924pgb.351.1521018219578; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 02:03:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521018219; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=stxJcB6UEsGvvtarbj/6PEfkOA2cV8lnj7cYVqAKeX/CHSAGtjoGLbvgvNikAYdf6Q q1kxPn+4cJhIw6frkFb7s76iq9IehAHDZLfMnYilon4SvbwdcY6EHLn9L2UPszoKiywV KQGr1XWKUWnA9nXpnFs8c9+TC1n8vZ6zrPj5XX07TmZ1ATPxCwJyNl/DMCVOQcz5/rJU UMbg3YN+Kazkwo2ENZSvxTpxh0W42SKt/OM4EQ4HXlGpVU2BYlPMTYGHxlWOukK96f/a 6ghpq0h38f997CZcBsApE+dS1VpL8CptkrYzgjINKFTZxVIjrZwL/6Xh6dKgorCEaJsJ eDuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=ew7LVs147ApHkG86MFf4FmjjhQukourrvb3GGYF+ZiM=; b=ASKDvuzXPCIglLKhh4OJjdY3qpxF4J22zp9cOgxQ/li6SBo0zc2wETaLgbsKquMIXt HuSaHmqLLPvpHbP1ZkVY8P/kjVvDio57T/gbI90IG42wpJIRao++mL30vV086svL4gm9 5iuXxQFtex0J27VNA+UVAbiBDN9CECeiSVZ9CIneymxSOoFWuiVjMiWiob5SCilwcE0p Ko6nJ+uxD8CzvjuHCPLA0HNSbUZSzKCjDgYzCxBw9UuaG7JfFm7vvcnfGys2ALK6Dy9Q 1GMJMk+m1e2iTV8k1xHUjBMUqt31mnG2ugr31YuqhiSqoNiWDMwqPMhzKnuZyD9F7VdS h8qg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a34-v6si1665884pld.8.2018.03.14.02.03.25; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 02:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751527AbeCNJCY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:02:24 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:34721 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089AbeCNJCX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:02:23 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D61E79F160; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:02:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:02:21 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Robin Murphy Cc: Nipun Gupta , hch@lst.de, linux@armlinux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, bhelgaas@google.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, johan@kernel.org, msuchanek@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: move dma configuration to bus infrastructure Message-ID: <20180314090221.GE28983@lst.de> References: <1520868292-2479-1-git-send-email-nipun.gupta@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> + .dev_groups = amba_dev_groups, >> + .match = amba_match, >> + .uevent = amba_uevent, >> + .pm = &amba_pm, >> + .dma_configure = amba_dma_configure, >> + .dma_deconfigure = amba_dma_deconfigure, >> + .force_dma = true, > > This patch should also be removing force_dma because it no longer makes > sense. If DMA configuration is now done by a bus-level callback, then a bus > which wants its children to get DMA configuration needs to implement that > callback; there's nowhere to force a "default" global behaviour any more. Btw, we don't really know how many busses currently rely on OF or ACPI configuration. So maybe we need to keep those as a default?