Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 06D4D60390
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Fix the page leak in pud/pmd_set_huge
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de,
        ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
        james.morse@arm.com, kristina.martsenko@arm.com,
        takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, toshi.kani@hpe.com
References: <1521017305-28518-1-git-send-email-cpandya@codeaurora.org>
 <1521017305-28518-4-git-send-email-cpandya@codeaurora.org>
 <20180314105343.nxw2mwkm4pao3hur@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
From:   Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <a3d0adc4-293a-328b-a8ea-ea410baa6849@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:57:29 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180314105343.nxw2mwkm4pao3hur@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 3/14/2018 4:23 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:18:24PM +0530, Chintan Pandya wrote:
>> While setting huge page, we need to take care of
>> previously existing next level mapping. Since,
>> we are going to overrite previous mapping, the
>> only reference to next level page table will get
>> lost and the next level page table will be zombie,
>> occupying space forever. So, free it before
>> overriding.
> 
>> @@ -939,6 +940,9 @@ int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>>   	BUG_ON(phys & ~PUD_MASK);
>> +	if (pud_val(*pud) && !pud_huge(*pud))
>> +		free_page((unsigned long)__va(pud_val(*pud)));
>> +
>>   	set_pud(pudp, pfn_pud(__phys_to_pfn(phys), sect_prot));
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>> @@ -953,6 +957,9 @@ int pmd_set_huge(pmd_t *pmdp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>>   	BUG_ON(phys & ~PMD_MASK);
>> +	if (pmd_val(*pmd) && !pmd_huge(*pmd))
>> +		free_page((unsigned long)__va(pmd_val(*pmd)));
>> +
> 
> As Marc noted, (assuming the subsequent revert is applied) in both of
> these cases, these tables are still live, and thus it is not safe to
> free them.
> 
> Consider that immediately after freeing the pages, they may get
> re-allocated elsewhere, where they may be modified. If this happens
> before TLB invalidation, page table walks may allocate junk into TLBs,
> resulting in a number of problems.
Ah okay. What about this sequence,
1) I store old PMD/PUD values
2) Update the PMD/PUD with section mapping
3) Invalidate TLB
4) Then free the *leaked* page

> 
> It is *never* safe to free a live page table, therefore NAK to this
> patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 

Chintan
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project