Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:38:18 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     hariprasath.elango@gmail.com
Cc:     aditya.shankar@microchip.com, ganesh.krishna@microchip.com,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: use kmemdup to replace kmalloc/memcpy
Message-ID: <20180314113818.GA7169@kroah.com>
References: <20180313124932.15038-1-hariprasath.elango@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180313124932.15038-1-hariprasath.elango@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:19:32PM +0530, hariprasath.elango@gmail.com wrote:
> From: HariPrasath Elango <hariprasath.elango@gmail.com>
> 
> kmalloc followed by memcpy can be replaced by kmemdup.Also added the
> related error handling part
> 
> Signed-off-by: HariPrasath Elango <hariprasath.elango@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

You have sent at least 8 patches for this driver over the past day, yet
I have no idea what order to apply these in at all.

Please resend them all as a proper patch series, numbered so I have a
clue as to what order to apply them in.  Also preserve the acks/reviews
that others have provided so they don't have to provide that again.

thanks,

greg k-h