Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1199981imn; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:39:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELs4ecCWxIZ/DGLShiIQtB89uMjibo3a8U3qBFAGuQZvPqKrjXIJ+/A4HLw1ps8Qokvt8UjR X-Received: by 10.101.93.15 with SMTP id e15mr4571205pgr.175.1521056343109; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:39:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521056343; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=n4YNvW8PycsW/Sw47sZo7Y+26QbDqcAdnhdyG7ePn76xEMHrDWTPJ10IovXMzwqUu0 B9LQui3ICcb8pZ/WWDe/jQfEZXD4V9rhxFCAYuMd6825GipnZm1cTZ5zc5i0o+mb8ZEH x/BKHWrWWtkLAgOMoEffsDJdYITFvSnviFmioMDKM9QBbbBEW+Tuot1luK+YamNWKLIx mc3+QHM1pq6p56791ERLitoGQovJomXg4fsHXfSrXz5/+m0WzImg+gNscC3R+04/TSUF D3xvxUM4M3JPT5Rz6nG+hCYncVXkWwht5+7Zg60FXbDJW1hxYS+S4VUxoF9dR2h73NON CjBw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=ZbFLZSkgD2dFpoEVpQsPQYT/ryiSnnK7a5j05NM9k24=; b=FSmgs5IbSQz1rzcS39ndO0+Cmmk4oyuP0bEZQx088m51D1XZ1wuE8Vspf5Uie2DVdv IVD5Fza6eZl7te7hb4ITtN04VZP1JLOoV5EttPHSyymSt7gYGtIuPIaFbAcRlYGEfN4h aQHBdJFDRIjk3W6uJgd0IpXFZXScr4bhelD4CyiG/qL+LwPO9hL2Vd5EN0lWXLK3TpX8 PxJSc2FG8V2p4uxa4BunES6Srmt3teEdG/kCsk4OW8iymK+vnWOUzXk4jXdWPOWRRc+5 7r/s05xHI1wlr85U9R5e0vY5l8U4SsBZUOup1YnVPbPiK2kTCA5dxoidH6gW/RgA76ii mQ0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y184si2258752pgb.120.2018.03.14.12.38.48; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751527AbeCNTgf (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:36:35 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:52098 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750950AbeCNTge (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:36:34 -0400 Received: from p4fea5f09.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.95.9] helo=nanos.glx-home) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ewCCH-0007zj-S1; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:36:26 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:36:25 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Palmer Dabbelt cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, Will Deacon , jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, shorne@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] arm: Convert to GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:07:35 PDT (-0700), tglx@linutronix.de wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > > > > This converts the ARM port to use the recently added > > > GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER, which is essentially just a copy of ARM's > > > existhing MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER. The only changes are: > > > > > > * handle_arch_irq is now defined in a generic C file instead of an > > > arm-specific assembly file. > > > * handle_arch_irq is not marked as __ro_after_init. > > > > Why? What prevents the generic implementation from doing so? > > Sorry, I guess that should have said "handle_arch_irq was not marked as > __ro_after_init". The patch set has __ro_after_init for the generic > implementation, which was not the case for the arm version. That makes sense.... I'll fix that up. Thanks, tglx