Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1236763imn; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:52:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsdLSF2TC+6oNIUysSBBKICLtXnPoDRR20dE3MrvzNYqPr5S6VPeY6KO+mejz1VNrta6yLj X-Received: by 10.98.202.138 with SMTP id y10mr5544113pfk.184.1521060777006; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:52:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521060776; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=quQv9p962V3ybIqmv/50gBERNcZ6UZhIuFsQuwlra8Znn9TJD827nByK1xP5Pg3CXv 5hmTGl9KipKra/IJRmoBzDGoR0NtgD6NoYbLEcf/46ZTDQdRQmXvhf53dyu2sVBtu8Lo RXWECWdxuICityJ1I5wcesDpXx35hGi2cI773SfBH9l4ngILqdWBMqD1nG/6EjiR0H2j Ou52SobEjiVnhDpj4FLn4k+jLVNyE1561Q02sfEIgx7zOo2Givl/P0VY4s2HLUoFEbPV o0UrWaJWbqk85te/x46bSCyDaisJcVhKj4udWmIBBj5ceszmyjBMJ1MhO516NLgHvV+C dCUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=KxHDhWoQx3iZ8tQvHLkZSmKX4VxH5MfBfulFzxDvuYY=; b=YUE4RwrxD+BtYSfYhetIU3hwfrqMpfznFt10WOqkVv00JFLA/Wzv2b5g0d34JVrQKg wtXLYe1wDE4wi/kNFN4Goj8tA4vl0b0GBZuVGs8nhv2dcwnlRi7Z/gjmme6GLGx8Rymk 06WOke/3+cizIUidqBsCLfNmFbpzvJ5cOjU/kFMYeydvLziX3Dr5xrsMJMEOQ4VmPrmK C9b6nkraHKwbLYlYEitr5JXC5CFwZU6SOb2TNESCeGIncwrAkJFSpwmkDprm86LPBXwZ aloh+3HUUHjXc6K0LHRU30ZdDX7LHokS5+J6zy4jGuNZ0EpdLu34oNz3A310sI8WED8/ MO5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k5si2367199pgq.557.2018.03.14.13.52.42; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751673AbeCNUue (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:50:34 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:22740 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751279AbeCNUuc (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:50:32 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2018 13:50:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,307,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="25310712" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.232.112.44]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2018 13:50:30 -0700 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:52:30 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Oza Pawandeep Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Philippe Ombredanne , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kate Stewart , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dongdong Liu , Wei Zhang , Sinan Kaya , Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/DPC: Fix PCI legacy interrupt acknowledgement Message-ID: <20180314205230.GF29867@localhost.localdomain> References: <1521042648-20522-1-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1521042648-20522-1-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:20:48PM +0530, Oza Pawandeep wrote: > Current DPC driver acknowledges the interrupt in deferred work, which works > since MSI are edge triggered. > > But when MSI is disabled (e.g. pci=nomsi boot option) port service > driver falls back to PCI legacy INT interrupt. > > With current code we do not acknowledge the interrupt back in dpc_irq() > and we get dpc interrupt storm. > > This patch acknowledges the interrupt in interrupt handler. > > Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep Thanks, this looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Keith Busch