Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp56235imn; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:22:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsHLg5NXJpv/EifKzaPMaLS0wcp9ndwo7znyjw+AkBUHalcrLpCReJeS4VDUVPmP9hBv5HQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:3124:: with SMTP id w33-v6mr8987018plb.119.1521130979821; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:22:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521130979; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q6pcic2xHcK55ue7EfwWFk02+Q4gDxrlZEw67QJC89xRjdL9qBws+CCL3AUmkzEixB y/cAzLZDAQToBBhv/W/nX+98bvyPLosRC8M5OsDJDZL5Dc1CyBOyFwytObpy7kj6oZ1S c6PflI/Lg71qitfbDaQtYDp5dsYaEYo8EdFzwQHfvJCgpuZdpOYJwaiUNGdzkR8x5yYm yoYVp4ojuafJRoqNJi/Qj7315DEx9nUQVsYaZ+0/3M776BBPxa4hgWlWFwsODnzUNUlI VO7XxU0h0rBS3Cg7VHuyoqqZ/gO/BznHouVIP3gTeDoqKdwP+zjK2W69wF0EWaqRsB+G 9L7Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dmarc-filter :dkim-signature:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=/8lnaFY7RjhQs+fekBpK5maEmPxwkrzvQwEGWHAO3sM=; b=ZiCdLPUJYE5Wr/EKMRw6jPSRDODiLb/3oNd5d+U1j+ObW78m7eMf6/I3afmGmFaSS9 PhFsbezRpvJmbEprTfP+N63Z0Ro1AUmss46xbB7G2BmkufV2nll1/10b1zYBPQcz+LgU TmE4Ahp7TnJ2Lk7wRPsuhuvgEitvMJUVncYnpMv7wRl2CpB0/AsaUbmEjK8FuGH+zRJ6 mZIuS6E8/sFkabh1+OumMDPuelEtUok0Lfjy9SPmPF8bc7GzXxezALi26DqiRQJC1TFf 0JQv1fMRXKifV/1/0EBL+awSMbQVCrkwXNpcUfhy8rCtYGPXuDupFNi3zd5dCOjTZ33B JZOA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=GS/Oip0h; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=GS/Oip0h; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i12si3620930pgf.713.2018.03.15.09.22.44; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=GS/Oip0h; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=GS/Oip0h; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752218AbeCOQVX (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:21:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:48814 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751357AbeCOQVV (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:21:21 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2DDD60AE0; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:21:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1521130880; bh=9GoHyDBg3R6kJUH0bwV8yKW3eOWfNS/JRiJwXldgucQ=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GS/Oip0hkOEq40KFomN6kX+acqD2KKJUwj6n1Fr6GPW6fF4yH+v5Rct9YQcnNmjHZ 7CWzPFtwtA5g6J/nuK69vr6BElHfGM78IjN6Qxwt2ErbzWnrIwF70MSQLTwLIC93sX hzzGKQr2G2pnT0H719Aw+N0wOOxuYPb0uulifjKM= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from [192.168.0.105] (cpe-174-109-247-98.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.247.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: okaya@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48B9460590; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:21:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1521130880; bh=9GoHyDBg3R6kJUH0bwV8yKW3eOWfNS/JRiJwXldgucQ=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GS/Oip0hkOEq40KFomN6kX+acqD2KKJUwj6n1Fr6GPW6fF4yH+v5Rct9YQcnNmjHZ 7CWzPFtwtA5g6J/nuK69vr6BElHfGM78IjN6Qxwt2ErbzWnrIwF70MSQLTwLIC93sX hzzGKQr2G2pnT0H719Aw+N0wOOxuYPb0uulifjKM= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 48B9460590 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs To: Alexander Duyck Cc: Timur Tabi , Netdev , sulrich@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jeff Kirsher , intel-wired-lan , LKML References: <1520997629-17361-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1520997629-17361-7-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <12150aa0-77ba-878e-31f4-d4f8d6a28ccb@codeaurora.org> <2a4f4dec64b7462ae64152f6c2df9754@codeaurora.org> <53bf7dfe-32ee-1861-e6ea-81f667590a43@codeaurora.org> From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:21:17 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/15/2018 10:32 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > We tend to do something like: > update tx_buffer_info > update tx_desc > wmb() > point first tx_buffer_info next_to_watch value at last tx_desc > update next_to_use > notify device via writel > > We do it this way because we have to synchronize between the Tx > cleanup path and the hardware so we basically lump the two barriers > together. instead of invoking both a smp_wmb and a wmb. Now that I > look at the pseudocode though I wonder if we shouldn't move the > next_to_use update before the wmb, but that might be material for > another patch. Anyway, in the Tx cleanup path we should have an > smp_rmb() after we read the next_to_watch values so that we avoid > reading any of the other fields in the buffer_info if either the field > is NULL or the descriptor pointed to has not been written back. How do you feel about keeping wmb() very close to writel_relaxed() like this? update tx_buffer_info update tx_desc point first tx_buffer_info next_to_watch value at last tx_desc update next_to_use wmb() notify device via writel_relaxed() I'm afraid that if the order of wmb() and writel() is not very obvious or hidden in multiple functions, somebody can introduce a very nasty bug in the future. We also have to think about code maintenance. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.