Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp177388imn; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:18:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtTjcXLyJ91f2bZjxSgBfSG2xdJBTRaDyxoByiuLLfoqzk1rYEgbQGVLGkocawZX+PRQi6z X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:529:: with SMTP id 38-v6mr9580711plf.64.1521145129337; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:18:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521145129; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YsWxRNo8X1dOuqTl2Lz1aXZe5NQkQNzM3fkMY4HFanITY6Obfh97zoEmnYySzc254U Xg44WJBu+Ayqs7xko4IOixgezwUirXFDCvX+ge2ZBB3MBc1SSQIbPpQvh0XFuyF3eF2A CiBdmHMml11JfDRDeOR3O63koQ9P1KMO4qkVel5fZf3k/oBtfTj7MrkorbxjhuC76POy 0sJdGy6kBWxR5ZGWrf7U5qTMp4P3O4lly0tW2QUC1J5AwTlM74jYPEr2OCPxvfsuHmUe EP/jp3PzfpluDcsWWrJJ8UhP7J4cWLcmvtgXCCxacnRWIkHVKgFrfCa3C3UCt8m9Aaw1 w9AQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=pEfkLNh+y9VFV0d8wHvs8SLI4o+1p3TEvHJcVVsDuvA=; b=uOhLP4vTaLIPyTiVQlzPwNhHaO7k99nEG3LaZJnOoPOozXDe/hweP5MTa1Rp5OF/zx HwrihEFbc37spCNctkp8XErOciY+IS+glA9oMRrPqQmg+F/JJXUejiiSYsB8jRc1V4aA DoslpSvd6i+t4+M/grXytr+QaA40u+JETKV8fAyWfGxTVji2e+2kbUqoqf7NmYMr6Zz8 3UtpIYqeCfyvJf0MRfP0DZE7RlBL9cpEXqfztF2JIUY5SNbXlNdXgS8q/X9/4JhWH3hW caxKEbhv22LDlZ3AXhfaO05KyHaytASQF11AKhBDxnDNhLJxL9zX/MzhW5PWvJ7tcI/g XM5Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a6-v6si4388076plz.165.2018.03.15.13.18.34; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752810AbeCOURJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:17:09 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:54536 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752640AbeCOURI (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:17:08 -0400 Received: from p4fea5f09.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.95.9] helo=nanos.glx-home) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ewZJB-000755-Vl; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 21:17:06 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 21:17:05 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: jason.vas.dias@gmail.com cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, andi@firstfloor.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.16-rc5 (3)] x86/vdso: on Intel, VDSO should handle CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW In-Reply-To: <1521129648-20889-1-git-send-email-jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1521129648-20889-1-git-send-email-jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jason, On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, jason.vas.dias@gmail.com wrote: > Resent to address reviewer comments. I was being patient so far and tried to guide you through the patch submission process, but unfortunately this turns out to be just waste of my time. You have not addressed any of the comments I made here: [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1803141511340.2481@nanos.tec.linutronix.de [2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1803141527300.2481@nanos.tec.linutronix.de But still you claim that you addressed reviewer comments. The delta between the two patch series shows clearly that you ignored both review mails completely. You merily changed the implementation of a function, which I not even reviewed, and fiddled in the big fat comment. Feel free to ignore me, but rest assured that this is the last chance before you end up in the /dev/null mail filter. I recommend you to try to fixup only the first patch and once that is good to go you might try to submit the rest. But please take your time and address _ALL_ of my comments and follow the documented rules. If you have questions regarding my comments or the process after working through them and the Documentation I pointed to, feel free to ask them on the list and not in private mail. If you think that my comments or recommendations are wrong, discuss them on list instead of silently ignoring them. Yours grumpy tglx