Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] mmc: Export host capabilities to debugfs.
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
CC:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>, <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <Vladimir_Zapolskiy@mentor.com>
References: <1520917812-20047-1-git-send-email-harish_kandiga@mentor.com>
 <CAPDyKFo8jFwDO1E=tNSd4yTn3qtefzvHK0V70fcEqzB=SibrJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1521109575.10722.654.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <CAPDyKFrZaDx2NdvaFdgOxWBuwtjMnJE41p=x5b2x2moFEO3kXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@mentor.com>
Message-ID: <b93613a1-f35d-d246-5e1d-dc7821eb5976@mentor.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:50:40 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrZaDx2NdvaFdgOxWBuwtjMnJE41p=x5b2x2moFEO3kXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On Thursday 15 March 2018 05:59 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 15 March 2018 at 11:26, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 11:12 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 13 March 2018 at 06:10, Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@mentor.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>> Honestly, I don't like this, but maybe other people do, then I am fine
>>> with this approach.
>>>
>>> If were to decide, I would just rather print the caps field in a
>>> hexadecimal bit form and leave the translation to the user.
>> A compromise would be to print both:
>>
>> 0xHHHHHHHH\n
>> Description of each enabled field, one per line
>>
>>
>> Another format would be:
>>
>> Bit XX: Description of a field
> If we were to print the description, there is no point in printing the
> bits in hex. Or is it?
Yes. I also do not see the use of printing hex value if we are printing the description.

>
> As I said, if you and other folkz thinks this is valuable, then I am
> fine as well. Just saying, it's not my preferred option.
>
>


I just want to inform that the idea of printing the description came after discussion in https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg48246.html, where it was decided adding utility in mmc-utils was not going to work ( reason:  We may very well be changing the bit offsets for the caps and caps2 in the mmc kernel header, keeping a copy of them is not a good idea. It's just a matter of *when* it will break).

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 11:12 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> If were to decide, I would just rather print the caps field in a hexadecimal bit form and leave the translation to the user.

I think translation becomes difficult for the above reason and hence I would prefer printing the description.

Note: Printing values in Hex was the original idea and it is also available in https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg48213.html just in case if it is required.


Thanks & Regards,
Harish Jenny K N