Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp259269imn; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvs5ZLbWkq9yS3NkEQYh/rXzsVWIpfhgMELLPlmEpM6SysdpRdWJaW/5KM7XLJoaw0nrLqE X-Received: by 10.98.223.143 with SMTP id d15mr943518pfl.208.1521191196722; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521191196; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=csGdG9DCjeBxqSe6IUxKg90Gky0mssOTnaDqmJcyhWQK27tbyJoW5EHlI7NtAey6Dw f965FERubv5HGZ2Nra9oyzVqzsUf0ajMhj6/e9TZMWWDS2bDyCUUWiRTzC4a+uvQazXV B7ZdOixDVBhHyylJyEp4biovVifnReM5BFm8L7CJxObzRiIC+ukefibPr+zK+U+zYH5y A+Ul10yHJPAwqsX1zyipAfDRHA2ha2ByRUp9jYDRUlOj6jNM6iDU2y7Tm507IAeK7FvN y/YhmYl0kenmAm/FtEkrKcQ9qaV8tj81xkkJdxyeq8915+voaDBK8N7lUituENiazX/1 oRVQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=SsmaraDLQmiQQkvILcD0BDAkzWyGOCYtKnHQJ3f64Hs=; b=OfJABxImS46AkNuNXBwhmR0CAMs05rqRW2NgmrfmV0lcqa7YkQUI3fuO43TKOf2FCT JON61UKgSr7mvHPmlarPrpcndfIuY3CO6ob0SLi7Evls6pARAbBme8CS/jGsO7dH6xCf lT1EMuPpHDJY8X3sJHAd4dTQe95lG+0+LHNTGfBNzjNlXDH53NzkeSH4hw+je1b7/6W6 f29iMdn0WIpzqx0OI/R4P7tb9YXXCZYkGVpSKzyIM1KFDUMhDysijCX3z+aWn+E843c+ xI/0VAkdWGVnuJwRgw001L6Y03m7E/Su1AM2Wv7xYAdczYlGswJeMq7trwAYlrmUYBkJ NdLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n23-v6si3624189pll.175.2018.03.16.02.06.22; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752604AbeCPJFP (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:05:15 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:38108 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751586AbeCPJFO (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:05:14 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: Nedap ESD1 at mail.skyhub.de Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (blast.alien8.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 1MtCs4mQzer4; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:04:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from pd.tnic (p200300EC2BC96100F48A585EAF4AEB55.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bc9:6100:f48a:585e:af4a:eb55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 1CA231EC0283; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:04:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:04:35 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/microcode/AMD: Check microcode file sanity before loading it Message-ID: <20180316090435.GB5852@pd.tnic> References: <9964a6cf-00be-78ea-cc1e-7f7062716fce@maciej.szmigiero.name> <20180315232306.GA31610@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:40:40AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > I thought the one week absolute minimum resend time is for the case that > there are no comments to a patch, or, more generally, when there is no > action and not for "normal process" respins. > > submitting-patches.rst says: > > Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment, > > but the development process works more smoothly than that now. You should > > receive comments within a week or so; Well, it says that *exactly* - you should receive comments within a week. In your case, you got some of them even earlier. Think of it this way: one week is more or less ok period when reviewers have time to go through a patchset and give their comments. Keep in mind that maintainers/reviewers get other patchsets to review too and they can't always react immediately. In *addition* to the other crap they have on their plate. So patience is a good idea here :) Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.