Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, jeyu@kernel.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 69/86] x86/module: Detect and skip invalid relocations
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:23:32 +0100
Message-Id: <20180316152322.014506339@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180316152317.167709497@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180316152317.167709497@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>

commit eda9cec4c9a12208a6f69fbe68f72a6311d50032 upstream.

There have been some cases where external tooling (e.g., kpatch-build)
creates a corrupt relocation which targets the wrong address.  This is a
silent failure which can corrupt memory in unexpected places.

On x86, the bytes of data being overwritten by relocations are always
initialized to zero beforehand.  Use that knowledge to add sanity checks
to detect such cases before they corrupt memory.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: jeyu@kernel.org
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/37450d6c6225e54db107fba447ce9e56e5f758e9.1509713553.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
[ Restructured the messages, as it's unclear whether the relocation or the target is corrupted. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/module.c |   13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/module.c
@@ -171,19 +171,27 @@ int apply_relocate_add(Elf64_Shdr *sechd
 		case R_X86_64_NONE:
 			break;
 		case R_X86_64_64:
+			if (*(u64 *)loc != 0)
+				goto invalid_relocation;
 			*(u64 *)loc = val;
 			break;
 		case R_X86_64_32:
+			if (*(u32 *)loc != 0)
+				goto invalid_relocation;
 			*(u32 *)loc = val;
 			if (val != *(u32 *)loc)
 				goto overflow;
 			break;
 		case R_X86_64_32S:
+			if (*(s32 *)loc != 0)
+				goto invalid_relocation;
 			*(s32 *)loc = val;
 			if ((s64)val != *(s32 *)loc)
 				goto overflow;
 			break;
 		case R_X86_64_PC32:
+			if (*(u32 *)loc != 0)
+				goto invalid_relocation;
 			val -= (u64)loc;
 			*(u32 *)loc = val;
 #if 0
@@ -199,6 +207,11 @@ int apply_relocate_add(Elf64_Shdr *sechd
 	}
 	return 0;
 
+invalid_relocation:
+	pr_err("x86/modules: Skipping invalid relocation target, existing value is nonzero for type %d, loc %p, val %Lx\n",
+	       (int)ELF64_R_TYPE(rel[i].r_info), loc, val);
+	return -ENOEXEC;
+
 overflow:
 	pr_err("overflow in relocation type %d val %Lx\n",
 	       (int)ELF64_R_TYPE(rel[i].r_info), val);