Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
CC:     "bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org" 
        <driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        "olaf@aepfle.de" <olaf@aepfle.de>,
        "apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>,
        "jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        "vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        "marcelo.cerri@canonical.com" <marcelo.cerri@canonical.com>,
        "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: hv: Remove hbus->enum_sem
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: hv: Remove hbus->enum_sem
Thread-Index: AQHTvRUvoNaABQDMC0G3r2/gk+Xw06PTHeHg
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:41:27 +0000
Message-ID: <KL1P15301MB00064DA6B4D221123B5241CFBFD70@KL1P15301MB0006.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <KL1P15301MB0006E2FA71F87B312D9DECA4BFD00@KL1P15301MB0006.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <20180316105424.GA24198@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180316105424.GA24198@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Enabled=True;
 MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_SiteId=72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47;
 MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Owner=decui@microsoft.com;
 MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_SetDate=2018-03-16T17:41:26.0382290Z;
 MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Name=General;
 MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Application=Microsoft Azure
 Information Protection;
 MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Extended_MSFT_Method=Automatic;
 Sensitivity=General
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is )
 smtp.mailfrom=decui@microsoft.com; 
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:e::40b]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;KL1P15301MB0023;7:2xsV3nhBiW8NCMSuTHSC9mDGs+1kvMnUXatnECE/V/ZqscIn5WDo8pqKWZaI1aBnPI9sJJ/KddhlpQnqrJTkTuAbnkgE8fW2lKGsxG1UZBuHOVUnx8Dbxr39iWkisRAA0oK0G6lJoxMfbrref2u/nelviuArHr6Tw2d/WOr2/0fP2Plr4zWBM1saVUMIwPK8CpIw5A8uVc2ZxpJlh4HfBi0JATqUNAwl94AiUQXcv3V+g69SOtpdKl/u1Khssvwm;20:5meboK3U+OO4Rwl1lEBjm0lVg9KgkFX6dE0w2CuimXiZ/u9xQh+TT2Gnmbv2HwZeGBbDEZyjPaPOkpW7UXUOE4Jy1sNINyph7SyRlheYC9sWh7toH35P6VCSwfLAP0g5S0W2dP7w1YOyD24zABAlzYv+0oUxyQ3VT3LTmsjAsxE=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;SSOR;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 058397ce-0f95-4429-ceb8-08d58b6525da
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7193020);SRVR:KL1P15301MB0023;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: KL1P15301MB0023:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <KL1P15301MB00233A4DBA1291174D6E208BBFD70@KL1P15301MB0023.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(180628864354917);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(8211001083)(61425038)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3231221)(944501244)(52105095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041310)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011);SRVR:KL1P15301MB0023;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:KL1P15301MB0023;
x-forefront-prvs: 0613912E23
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(39380400002)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(199004)(189003)(966005)(7736002)(68736007)(33656002)(10090500001)(6116002)(186003)(10290500003)(2906002)(3660700001)(478600001)(3280700002)(106356001)(6506007)(105586002)(54906003)(22452003)(2900100001)(316002)(102836004)(305945005)(8990500004)(14454004)(77096007)(25786009)(4326008)(53936002)(9686003)(6306002)(55016002)(6436002)(59450400001)(107886003)(81156014)(7416002)(81166006)(86362001)(76176011)(7696005)(99286004)(8676002)(5660300001)(46003)(6246003)(97736004)(229853002)(86612001)(8936002)(2950100002)(6916009)(74316002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:KL1P15301MB0023;H:KL1P15301MB0006.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM;FPR:;SPF:None;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: HmermEp2aHKwGFvJWLkbmF1xg/LMpMCK3CMS/WxbCzEfC7Ya2+6c+sIpT6AK+BivMNT9Ak5X+jhx/actWq7sCmCg1sEtb4eCCu1XDiT/E2I82RQbqdRaMT5rl4xS0NIAbtSojJDAdWe8yAzZGV677g/7xu8YbOTgZFKCig8Ww2aNAA9GmNJLywN9k/7kZTEbMiP7fF14V+gLro4Ps8aD+rv5XWJeollCE9mmpaixejp+c7GRZOnbAVywU5IIiNAd4ZIYD3TuEFpDJDzPEdtu9zMI1tuiua1JJbSaapk9EmDtj6ClYdYZRL0p4y+Yp5uypnUidOxVowQIreG1YjODjQ==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 058397ce-0f95-4429-ceb8-08d58b6525da
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Mar 2018 17:41:28.0483
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: KL1P15301MB0023
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 03:54
> ...
> Dexuan,
> while applying/updating these patches I notice this one may be squashed
> into: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/886266/
>=20
> since they logically belong in the same patch. Are you OK with me doing
> that ? Is my reading correct ?
> Lorenzo

I'm OK.=20
I used two patches
[PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: hv: Serialize the present and eject work items
[PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: hv: Remove hbus->enum_sem
only because the first fixed a real issue and hence IMO should go into
stable kernels, and the second is only a cleanup patch, which doesn't
need go into stable kernels.

Either way is ok to me.=20
Please feel free to do whatever you think is better. :-)

Thanks,
-- Dexuan