Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3FDC7217D8
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180316184348.GA20184@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20180315190529.20943-1-linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
 <20180315190529.20943-4-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <20180316184348.GA20184@localhost.localdomain>
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:03:53 +0000
Message-ID: <CALCETrUQzPGjzGrO_J5DmG4Tp+11O+1jB3KY8XX2GTYsZ3-VTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/36] mm: use do_futex() instead of sys_futex() in mm_release()
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc:     Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:04:56PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
>> sys_futex() is a wrapper to do_futex() which does not modify any
>> values here:
>>
>> - uaddr, val and val3 are kept the same
>>
>> - op is masked with FUTEX_CMD_MASK, but is always set to FUTEX_WAKE.
>>   Therefore, val2 is always 0.
>>
>> - as utime is set to NULL, *timeout is NULL
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
>
> Hi Dominik,
>
> I'm missing the "why" part here. What is it you are trying to address?
>
> do_futex is not currently in use outside of the futex implementation,
> while sys_futex is. This decouples the interface from the
> implementation. While this is perhaps less critical within the
> kernel, I don't see a compelling reason to increase the coupling
> between the mm and futex implementations.
>
> Without a compelling WHY, Nack from me.
>

We want to make some changes to the way that the syscall entry code
invokes syscalls, and these changes will make it impossible to call
sys_xyz() functions from the kernel.  So we can make sys_futex() be a
trivial wrapper around a new ksys_futex(), or we can do a patch like
this.