Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp613691imn; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:15:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtUhWM2IKjrWzm/LgoJaOJWzr6RWYCRNz/YXIvEh0eAc2eNb2A2XMXzwIOuPx/yNOifCcHU X-Received: by 10.99.177.7 with SMTP id r7mr2471530pgf.76.1521231355339; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:15:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521231355; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WtMNBFskm0o0YaS/ZYbSehIcBUvS7ppIziSRvpDs5o4sS/jwB7a2ZHOLFwgAtP25sL TH6F/4ixhVxHDxQa68aBPrWBjC9fqPvfg06k9ppiawEOac9fYKH9eXqQG5ugZwsOFkkh fRUCeIfiHBi07t7abBHb6wEzPW/reLdOdIqoPPRF7zTG0/XplUjEHQBI2HJz7JQ/vGeI OAxUTfc/k7RKJXF98PNlBTi9pBKRzUe8ykA+A0K9joZIJK4jMF8GsvH3tsoBDMZNM1tf LG+VX54mx0EAi+SciMK4OmKb4zPFGUnBkidOtPdaz2bKqgbeq45TyFMqYFlgCCW1UvA5 fxcw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=As8eiw4kovL4HNRmBHdKkuGnMhwwoR7O+JB2wfSt6yo=; b=SumD7yuHdrmbYolt4lfSoRZUxkGKqDMVzGx26xO0nL9FpAmEqkQcYLmea5cdQVQVXc RmNli34vsVE073CPrXltQATfVI1Z7Vx6Rvc0ichp0S4NTCxB8x7Ce51/14xHYubDFocZ HFDunLVeW42bySUiK2hw4GjCCsvLWf7Y7JW040EHesnTDUN8ijMlDIJkAmFmX9TpifSw 9godhzji69zoN0iTNj4sTmUEgv66Qg8NQ1f+G/gYTfOuOZkE32etmmfsbUqcZ5hIyvMv T8JcfFLgaWjJR9T+WmBoWA+XeXAoQvTMRnUdAxg36/ImYsqFjP2NPbC4bwD6bE9V4wSa B2PA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=o3nHz0kg; dkim=fail header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=HSqt69sp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e61-v6si6918072plb.190.2018.03.16.13.15.40; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=o3nHz0kg; dkim=fail header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=HSqt69sp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752685AbeCPUOV (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:14:21 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com ([209.85.214.68]:35321 "EHLO mail-it0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751701AbeCPUOS (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:14:18 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id v194-v6so3562211itb.0; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:14:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=As8eiw4kovL4HNRmBHdKkuGnMhwwoR7O+JB2wfSt6yo=; b=o3nHz0kgOqzzvcNWI8XGyQSyokNBHZOafnK5IENu2FKXsErzcLzfgkVT+y8NoKlfCg DFCe5zP8pOPW+et+OLdZV+B3029c49fcLW9XpDDAIJW338MpOsiC0QKCUhu0DYOzoohl sIENWDvulbDQiqElqowN+dGPIkk9RIqjTyVVnGWrmIMvGa+4HChmhzMl5fpMJZRi6qyH FNgVuRmQOAgU1jGvaxRTFQtfgHOcdDtqQgfU6kw46ykhSSU3xH9W8Pq7uAq++zY3ipwV s0HHJrIww34m902QR1uXtGj3fcVxT6E/cL4GuQKZ/N1/JaXxUfVkC3sbapQSU79u0M3z wF1Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=As8eiw4kovL4HNRmBHdKkuGnMhwwoR7O+JB2wfSt6yo=; b=HSqt69spXvh854FkVeVrhwO0qxPvAZuLu+MhlRXqp8AOnKy5Ww6dD0FdX4TFvh/IoD zrIrFqZ3CdnAVGnp1J26rZudu3qcdTR4sJem0RBzyCCGjOX4bS7Gv94ao2iHHtbGsNOR tNcsqycbZ+0NdfdW9QGr0XtJegasxQvJonkBc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=As8eiw4kovL4HNRmBHdKkuGnMhwwoR7O+JB2wfSt6yo=; b=oChgptw0En54tjgZdFCPzRJZBKUKJmWTzcENTdXvb+sBMFwg4qivPvoGNz/wcwL3i6 R6Y4qKnfc6NyvkHoW4UtKjNSc0qzTWBAedj/O6w9PdmEOx2hCT3ymOzSvTkWJYFxozPI ztFv/8gncKl/1Zaqs0E0BSeWe3N7TGb9CzHtl9KqwmcxlfJUlGFUw0aFKPJmpBb2eqaw gv0ZluAITMJhC28IXhNubJMGkMJwMBZkRVNbZIBEDVQMoC09vRtPhNB+6UAebUwGOL1E VAoySw6pIseAbcZPK2fNaqDI8E03Z10F25jlPhSw489yZCe56PQ/IXTrk6QkSGGX9mu4 Zw8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EcrUv38sskRXPng6haI0FeTGtJUX4sDOyPPDmxFgADCt/i7/R3 BwAftHPrt6SOVth+ZUHQnG7IbA6D5euyaXUm9rk= X-Received: by 2002:a24:cb05:: with SMTP id u5-v6mr3731015itg.100.1521231257870; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.135.221 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1521174359-46392-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> <20180316175502.GE30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:14:17 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Z1uPz-FhmbMhOGr5gmegDqT8tDI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Remove false-positive VLAs when using max() To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Al Viro , Florian Weimer , Kees Cook , Andrew Morton , Josh Poimboeuf , Rasmus Villemoes , Randy Dunlap , Ingo Molnar , David Laight , Ian Abbott , linux-input , linux-btrfs , Network Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Hardening Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote: >> >> Kees - is there some online "gcc-4.4 checker" somewhere? This does >> seem to work with my gcc. I actually tested some of those files you >> pointed at now. > > I use this one: > > https://godbolt.org/ Well, my *test* code works on that one and -Wvla -Werror. It does not work with gcc-4.1.x, but works with gcc-4.4.x. I can't seem to see the errors any way, I wonder if __builtin_choose_expr() simply didn't exist back then. Odd that you can't view warnings/errors with it. But it's possible that it fails on more complex stuff in the kernel. I've done a "allmodconfig" build with that patch, and the only issue it found was that (real) type issue in tpm_tis_core.h. Linus