Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 07/22] selftests/vm: fixed bugs in
 pkey_disable_clear()
To:     Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
References: <1519264541-7621-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
 <1519264541-7621-8-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc:     mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
        khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        bsingharora@gmail.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
        bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, arnd@arndb.de
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Message-ID: <dc5ee0c8-afe3-78aa-001d-7b49b398337b@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:08:20 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1519264541-7621-8-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 02/21/2018 05:55 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int flags)
>  			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
>  	pkey_assert(pkey_rights >= 0);
>  
> -	pkey_rights |= flags;
> +	pkey_rights &= ~flags;
>  
>  	ret = pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, 0);
>  	/* pkey_reg and flags have the same format */
> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int flags)
>  	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_reg: 0x%016lx\n", __func__,
>  			pkey, rdpkey_reg());
>  	if (flags)
> -		assert(rdpkey_reg() > orig_pkey_reg);
> +		assert(rdpkey_reg() < orig_pkey_reg);
>  }
>  
>  void pkey_write_allow(int pkey)

This seems so horribly wrong that I wonder how it worked in the first
place.  Any idea?