Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp461569imn; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:23:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELt7cHZtOgu7XPGrORyfzJIAoe4eXJsRNm3lupHNBotW9zigoA/bIObYpmrvRhJdcptFAMap X-Received: by 10.101.80.4 with SMTP id f4mr3284140pgo.81.1521307413121; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:23:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521307413; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XQjFQP2aolCgg+NZBgXt0JsiwKckvoPF6CneI3FcmZoVE68/pM7swld4E+95CD7IkH BD3YJpsbR39g86GuY3mvNt9rd73BkDDm7meGG57tVJJ/6oMrRM/u5VRVi/PTRs7UsfLa NfEztsE3n2F307HQpcU09Fl+ZYUOqoKIon5dXoD1pE+E80pruU2Lf2gl5tD1KG0I/D9b Kco4TJSvNTlGpMHYhplu5tEc+ONFDB20CV2tx2pkHIxcBnXvkUSgYC4qXQDDqkYtGfp2 cN5ZUYpDGhloKzXAyHoqD3dHtmPsbxCd16ZeYTEOpNi4JQ367LTIDYVV0Fy0Lma4LE2X CnIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=IiqTxrqKoweH/RWmXbxRcRCbEhxhzWgfeBnKKTrNfQ4=; b=y6s6Pzu2F8l6vz/Ak+X+ilC6LYWmH2hM5zM8dkd0is5/mxGQckJypUYQlUtMy/wmLm FUTOboKAmy60zHAy971zy5zThLMaWykJgb+kIugK7L0qtfmAG0VYVjxUEIGYbfPZ1aJF kVMOWQylhZEow58cHycoo3hQTkD2wr2JtnzFKt+u0HWp3OCJScUwDyDTJng7tkANkWJ7 FwStHganFYbLdiaE3YnKHF/bfdStr5l+66LSE6jJZWEhu9nPAN9c7hQIrAVMVAiCzox3 TQL2A7hn5ATNCN9JMDGeFuiTNyWp24fEZTyVeKP50bnwfxUL3ZidB7M8JEsxf3vs/rtz rD3A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t11-v6si8039978ply.226.2018.03.17.10.23.18; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:23:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753540AbeCQRVU (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:21:20 -0400 Received: from isilmar-4.linta.de ([136.243.71.142]:35086 "EHLO isilmar-4.linta.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752772AbeCQRVL (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:21:11 -0400 Received: from light.dominikbrodowski.net (isilmar.linta [10.0.0.1]) by isilmar-4.linta.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6585920090C; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by light.dominikbrodowski.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6AE3A20C52; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:44:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:44:07 +0100 From: Dominik Brodowski To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, luto@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/36] kernel: use kernel_wait4() instead of sys_wait4() Message-ID: <20180317164407.GB1619@light.dominikbrodowski.net> References: <20180315190529.20943-1-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <20180315190529.20943-3-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <20180316165831.GV4449@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180316165831.GV4449@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:58:31PM +0000, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:04:55PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c > > index 18e5fa4b0e71..f4b557cadf08 100644 > > --- a/kernel/umh.c > > +++ b/kernel/umh.c > > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(struct subprocess_info *sub_info) > > * > > * Thus the __user pointer cast is valid here. > > */ > > - sys_wait4(pid, (int __user *)&ret, 0, NULL); > > + kernel_wait4(pid, (int __user *)&ret, 0, NULL); > > > > /* > > * If ret is 0, either call_usermodehelper_exec_async failed and > > There is also a reference to sys_wait4() usage on umh.c: > > /* If SIGCLD is ignored sys_wait4 won't populate the status. */ > kernel_sigaction(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL); > > Does that remain true for kernel_wait4()? If so that comment should be updated > as well. Thanks, have updated the comment. Dominik